Akand Murat, Jatsenko Tatjana, Muilwijk Tim, Gevaert Thomas, Joniau Steven, Van der Aa Frank
Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Laboratory of Experimental Urology, Urogenital, Abdominal and Plastic Surgery, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 21;14:1424293. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1424293. eCollection 2024.
Bladder cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract. About 75% of all BC patients present with non-muscle-invasive BC (NMIBC), of which up to 70% will recur, and 15% will progress in stage and grade. As the recurrence and progression rates of NMIBC are strongly associated with some clinical and pathological factors, several risk stratification models have been developed to individually predict the short- and long-term risks of disease recurrence and progression. The NMIBC patients are stratified into four risk groups as low-, intermediate-, high-risk, and very high-risk by the European Association of Urology (EAU). Significant heterogeneity in terms of oncological outcomes and prognosis has been observed among NMIBC patients within the same EAU risk group, which has been partly attributed to the intrinsic heterogeneity of BC at the molecular level. Currently, we have a poor understanding of how to distinguish intermediate- and (very-)high-risk NMIBC with poor outcomes from those with a more benign disease course and lack predictive/prognostic tools that can specifically stratify them according to their pathologic and molecular properties. There is an unmet need for developing a more accurate scoring system that considers the treatment they receive after TURBT to enable their better stratification for further follow-up regimens and treatment selection, based also on a better response prediction to the treatment. Based on these facts, by employing a multi-layered (namely, genomics, epigenetics, transcriptomics, proteomics, lipidomics, metabolomics) and immunohistopathology approach, we hypothesize to decipher molecular heterogeneity of intermediate- and (very-)high-risk NMIBC and to better stratify the patients with this disease. A combination of different - will provide a more detailed and multi-dimensional characterization of the tumor and represent the broad spectrum of NMIBC phenotypes, which will help to decipher the molecular heterogeneity of intermediate- and (very-)high-risk NMIBC. We think that this combinatorial multi approach has the potential to improve the prediction of recurrence and progression with higher precision and to develop a molecular feature-based algorithm for stratifying the patients properly and guiding their therapeutic interventions in a personalized manner.
膀胱癌(BC)是泌尿系统最常见的恶性肿瘤。所有膀胱癌患者中约75%表现为非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC),其中高达70%会复发,15%会出现分期和分级进展。由于NMIBC的复发和进展率与一些临床和病理因素密切相关,已经开发了几种风险分层模型来分别预测疾病复发和进展的短期和长期风险。欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)将NMIBC患者分为低风险、中风险、高风险和极高风险四个风险组。在同一EAU风险组的NMIBC患者中,观察到肿瘤学结局和预后存在显著异质性,这在一定程度上归因于膀胱癌在分子水平上的内在异质性。目前,我们对于如何区分预后不良的中风险和(极)高风险NMIBC与病程更良性的NMIBC了解不足,并且缺乏能够根据其病理和分子特性对它们进行特异性分层的预测/预后工具。开发一种更准确的评分系统存在未满足的需求,该系统应考虑经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术(TURBT)后他们接受的治疗,以便基于对治疗的更好反应预测,对他们进行更好的分层,用于进一步的随访方案和治疗选择。基于这些事实,通过采用多层(即基因组学、表观遗传学、转录组学、蛋白质组学、脂质组学、代谢组学)和免疫组织病理学方法,我们假设能够解读中风险和(极)高风险NMIBC的分子异质性,并对这种疾病的患者进行更好的分层。不同方法的组合将提供更详细和多维度的肿瘤特征描述,并代表NMIBC表型的广泛范围,这将有助于解读中风险和(极)高风险NMIBC的分子异质性。我们认为这种组合式多方法有潜力以更高的精度改善复发和进展的预测,并开发一种基于分子特征的算法,以正确地对患者进行分层,并以个性化方式指导他们的治疗干预。