• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康技术评估是否已准备好使用生成式预训练转换器大型语言模型?鱼缸查询报告。

Is health technology assessment ready for generative pretrained transformer large language models? Report of a fishbowl inquiry.

机构信息

Independent Consultant, Health Care Technology & Policy, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, AdelaideSA, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 5;40(1):e48. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000382.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462324000382
PMID:39498482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11569908/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) 2023 Annual Meeting included a novel "fishbowl" session intended to 1) probe the role of HTA in the emergence of generative pretrained transformer (GPT) large language models (LLMs) into health care and 2) demonstrate the semistructured, interactive fishbowl process applied to an emerging "hot topic" by diverse international participants.

METHODS

The fishbowl process is a format for conducting medium-to-large group discussions. Participants are separated into an inner group and an outer group on the periphery. The inner group responds to a set of questions, whereas the outer group listens actively. During the session, participants voluntarily enter and leave the inner group. The questions for this fishbowl were: What are current and potential future applications of GPT LLMs in health care? How can HTA assess intended and unintended impacts of GPT LLM applications in health care? How might GPT be used to improve HTA methodology?

RESULTS

Participants offered approximately sixty responses across the three questions. Among the prominent themes were: improving operational efficiency, terminology and language, training and education, evidence synthesis, detecting and minimizing biases, stakeholder engagement, and recognizing and accounting for ethical, legal, and social implications.

CONCLUSIONS

The interactive fishbowl format enabled the sharing of real-time input on how GPT LLMs and related disruptive technologies will influence what technologies will be assessed, how they will be assessed, and how they might be used to improve HTA. It offers novel perspectives from the HTA community and aligns with certain aspects of ongoing HTA and evidence framework development.

摘要

目的

卫生技术评估国际(HTAi)2023 年年会包含了一个新颖的“鱼缸”环节,旨在:1)探究 HTA 在生成式预训练转换器(GPT)大型语言模型(LLM)进入医疗保健领域中的作用,以及 2)展示通过多样化的国际参与者应用于新兴“热点话题”的半结构化、互动式鱼缸流程。

方法

鱼缸流程是一种进行中型到大型群体讨论的格式。参与者被分为内圈和外圈两个小组。内圈回答一组问题,而外圈则积极倾听。在会议期间,参与者可以自愿加入或离开内圈。本次鱼缸讨论的问题是:GPT LLM 在医疗保健中的当前和潜在未来应用有哪些?HTA 如何评估 GPT LLM 应用在医疗保健中的预期和非预期影响?GPT 如何用于改进 HTA 方法?

结果

参与者针对这三个问题提供了大约六十个回复。其中突出的主题包括:提高运营效率、术语和语言、培训和教育、证据综合、检测和最小化偏差、利益相关者参与,以及认识和考虑道德、法律和社会影响。

结论

互动鱼缸式的形式使人们能够实时分享关于 GPT LLM 和相关颠覆性技术将如何影响需要评估的技术、如何评估它们以及如何利用它们来改进 HTA 的信息。它提供了 HTA 社区的新颖视角,并与正在进行的 HTA 和证据框架开发的某些方面相吻合。

相似文献

1
Is health technology assessment ready for generative pretrained transformer large language models? Report of a fishbowl inquiry.健康技术评估是否已准备好使用生成式预训练转换器大型语言模型?鱼缸查询报告。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 5;40(1):e48. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000382.
2
Assessing the Alignment of Large Language Models With Human Values for Mental Health Integration: Cross-Sectional Study Using Schwartz's Theory of Basic Values.评估大型语言模型与人类心理健康整合价值观的一致性:使用施瓦茨基本价值观理论的横断面研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Apr 9;11:e55988. doi: 10.2196/55988.
3
A Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT)-Powered Chatbot as a Simulated Patient to Practice History Taking: Prospective, Mixed Methods Study.基于生成式预训练转换器(GPT)的聊天机器人作为模拟患者进行病史采集的实践研究:前瞻性混合方法研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Jan 16;10:e53961. doi: 10.2196/53961.
4
The Role of Large Language Models in Transforming Emergency Medicine: Scoping Review.大型语言模型在变革急诊医学中的作用:范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 May 10;12:e53787. doi: 10.2196/53787.
5
Burning Issues in Health Technology Assessment and Policy Making: What's Keeping Senior Health Technology Assessment Users and Producers up at Night?健康技术评估和政策制定中的热点问题:是什么让资深健康技术评估使用者和生产者夜不能寐?
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36(1):5-7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319003477.
6
Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models Versus Peer Users for Interpreting Laboratory Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study.生成式大语言模型与同行用户对解释非专业患者实验室检测结果的答案质量比较:评估研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 17;26:e56655. doi: 10.2196/56655.
7
Examining the Role of Large Language Models in Orthopedics: Systematic Review.检查大型语言模型在骨科中的作用:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 15;26:e59607. doi: 10.2196/59607.
8
The Accuracy and Capability of Artificial Intelligence Solutions in Health Care Examinations and Certificates: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.人工智能解决方案在医疗检查和证书中的准确性和能力:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 5;26:e56532. doi: 10.2196/56532.
9
Large Language Models Versus Expert Clinicians in Crisis Prediction Among Telemental Health Patients: Comparative Study.大语言模型与专家临床医生在远程心理健康患者危机预测中的比较研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Aug 2;11:e58129. doi: 10.2196/58129.
10
Operationalizing and Implementing Pretrained, Large Artificial Intelligence Linguistic Models in the US Health Care System: Outlook of Generative Pretrained Transformer 3 (GPT-3) as a Service Model.在美国医疗保健系统中实施和应用预训练的大型人工智能语言模型:生成式预训练变换器3(GPT-3)作为服务模型的前景
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Feb 10;10(2):e32875. doi: 10.2196/32875.

本文引用的文献

1
AI Reporting Guidelines: How to Select the Best One for Your Research.人工智能报告指南:如何为你的研究选择最佳指南。
Radiol Artif Intell. 2023 Apr 5;5(3):e230055. doi: 10.1148/ryai.230055. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Are current clinical studies on artificial intelligence-based medical devices comprehensive enough to support a full health technology assessment? A systematic review.基于人工智能的医疗器械的当前临床研究是否足够全面,足以支持全面的健康技术评估?系统评价。
Artif Intell Med. 2023 Jun;140:102547. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102547. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
3
Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation?ChatGPT 和大型语言模型是实现系统评价自动化的“答案”吗?
Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 29;12(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02243-z.
4
ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns.ChatGPT在医学教育、研究与实践中的应用:对其前景与合理担忧的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 19;11(6):887. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060887.
5
Evaluating the Feasibility of ChatGPT in Healthcare: An Analysis of Multiple Clinical and Research Scenarios.评估 ChatGPT 在医疗保健中的可行性:对多个临床和研究场景的分析。
J Med Syst. 2023 Mar 4;47(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01925-4.
6
Building an evidence standards framework for artificial intelligence-enabled digital health technologies.为人工智能驱动的数字健康技术构建证据标准框架。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Apr;4(4):e216-e217. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00030-9.
7
What Makes Artificial Intelligence Exceptional in Health Technology Assessment?是什么让人工智能在卫生技术评估中脱颖而出?
Front Artif Intell. 2021 Nov 2;4:736697. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.736697. eCollection 2021.
8
Health Technology Assessment for Cardiovascular Digital Health Technologies and Artificial Intelligence: Why Is It Different?心血管数字健康技术和人工智能的健康技术评估:为什么不同?
Can J Cardiol. 2022 Feb;38(2):259-266. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.08.015. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
9
Artificial Intelligence and Health Technology Assessment: Anticipating a New Level of Complexity.人工智能与健康技术评估:期待新的复杂性水平。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 7;22(7):e17707. doi: 10.2196/17707.