• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物质使用者的冲动性:元认知信念和重复性消极思维作为潜在的维持因素。

Impulsiveness in Substance Users: Metacognitive Beliefs and Repetitive Negative Thinking as Potential Maintenance Factors.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Psychother. 2024 Nov-Dec;31(6):e70014. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70014.

DOI:10.1002/cpp.70014
PMID:39500330
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Using the self-regulatory executive function model as a basis, this study explored whether, among substance users, metacognitive beliefs and repetitive negative thinking were associated with impulsiveness.

METHODS

A total of 100 substance users were recruited. Impulsiveness, metacognitive beliefs, rumination and worry were assessed. Correlation and hierarchal regression analyses were run.

RESULTS

Beliefs about the need to control thoughts, lower cognitive self-consciousness and brooding rumination were found to be independent predictors of the total score on impulsiveness in the hierarchical regression analysis. Further regression analyses indicated that motor impulsiveness was predicted by a combination of beliefs about the need to control thoughts and brooding rumination, while non-planning impulsiveness was predicted by beliefs about the need to control thoughts and lower cognitive self-consciousness.

CONCLUSION

Among substance users, higher impulsiveness is associated with the tendency to endorse beliefs about the need to control thoughts and brooding rumination. Among substance users, beliefs about the need to control thoughts and brooding rumination (and potentially cognitive self-consciousness) could be a suitable therapeutic targets to mitigate particularly motor impulsiveness and non-planning impulsiveness.

摘要

简介

本研究以自我调节执行功能模型为基础,探讨物质使用者的元认知信念和重复性消极思维是否与冲动有关。

方法

共招募了 100 名物质使用者。评估了冲动、元认知信念、反刍和担忧。进行了相关性和层次回归分析。

结果

在层次回归分析中,发现控制思维的必要性信念、较低的认知自我意识和沉思式反刍与冲动的总分呈独立预测关系。进一步的回归分析表明,运动冲动性由控制思维的必要性信念和沉思式反刍的组合预测,而非计划性冲动性则由控制思维的必要性信念和较低的认知自我意识预测。

结论

在物质使用者中,较高的冲动性与认同控制思维的必要性信念和沉思式反刍的倾向有关。在物质使用者中,控制思维的必要性信念和沉思式反刍(以及潜在的认知自我意识)可能是缓解尤其是运动冲动性和非计划性冲动性的合适的治疗靶点。

相似文献

1
Impulsiveness in Substance Users: Metacognitive Beliefs and Repetitive Negative Thinking as Potential Maintenance Factors.物质使用者的冲动性:元认知信念和重复性消极思维作为潜在的维持因素。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2024 Nov-Dec;31(6):e70014. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70014.
2
Emotion dysregulation in participants with substance use disorders: A metacognitive perspective.物质使用障碍患者的情绪调节障碍:元认知视角。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Oct 15;363:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.144. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
3
Difficulties in emotion regulation: The role of repetitive negative thinking and metacognitive beliefs.情绪调节困难:重复消极思维和元认知信念的作用。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jul 1;308:473-483. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.086. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
4
Repetitive negative thinking, metacognitive beliefs, and their interaction as possible predictors for problematic cannabis use.反复消极思维、元认知信念及其相互作用作为大麻使用问题的可能预测因素。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022 Mar;29(2):706-717. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2664. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
5
Metacognitive beliefs and rumination as predictors of anger: A prospective study.元认知信念和沉思作为愤怒的预测因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Aggress Behav. 2017 Sep;43(5):421-429. doi: 10.1002/ab.21699. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
6
Metacognitions, rumination, and worry in personality disorder.人格障碍中的元认知、反刍和担忧。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Oct 1;293:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.024. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
7
Multiple paths to rumination within a network analytical framework.网络分析框架内的多种沉思路径。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 13;14(1):10874. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61469-6.
8
The relationship between metacognitive beliefs and symptoms in eating disorders.元认知信念与进食障碍症状之间的关系。
Psychiatriki. 2020 Jul-Sep;31(3):225-235. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2020.313.225.
9
Examining the role of positive and negative metacognitive beliefs in depression.探究积极和消极元认知信念在抑郁症中的作用。
Scand J Psychol. 2016 Oct;57(5):446-52. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12306. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
10
Experience sampling methodology study of anxiety and depression in adolescents with epilepsy: The role of metacognitive beliefs and perseverative thinking.经验采样法研究青少年癫痫患者的焦虑和抑郁:元认知信念和固执思维的作用。
Epilepsy Behav. 2024 Feb;151:109599. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109599. Epub 2023 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Metabeliefs about worry, cognitive fusion, and acceptance: associations and mediations analysis.关于担忧、认知融合和接纳的元信念:关联与中介分析
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 20;16:1639105. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1639105. eCollection 2025.
2
Positive Emotion Dysregulation: A Metacognitive Perspective.积极情绪失调:一种元认知视角
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 Jul-Aug;32(4):e70109. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70109.