University of South Florida Tampa, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.
Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241297326. doi: 10.1177/10732748241297326.
Ten percent of patients with melanoma develop in-transit metastases (ITM). Isolated limb infusion (ILI) is a well-established therapy for unresectable ITM on the extremities, but the ideal sequencing/line of therapy of ILI has not been defined. This study evaluates ILI as first-line, second-line, or third or later-line therapy.
A retrospective review included all patients with unresectable ITM who underwent ILI from 2006-2023.
A total of 130 patients were identified, 61% female, median age of 71 (31-89) years. Median follow-up was 37.5 months. ILI was first-line therapy in 80% (n = 104), second-line in 15% (n = 19), and third or later-line in 5.4% (n = 7). Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates for ILI as any line of therapy were 74% and 41%, respectively. ORR for ILI as first, second, or third or later-line therapy were 78%, 63%, and 57%, respectively. CR rates for ILI as first, second, or third or later-line therapy were 42%, 37%, and 43%, respectively. There were no significant differences in ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, or disease-free survival between therapy lines. Median PFS for ILI as first, second, or third or later-line therapy were 6.9, 5.4, and 18 months, respectively.
Patients responded well to ILI, whether or not they received previous therapies for unresectable ITM. First-line ILI appears to have a better ORR than later lines of ILI. Although sample size limited statistical significance, there was a 21% improvement in ORR when ILI was used as first-line vs third-line therapy, which is clinically meaningful. ILI is effective for unresectable melanoma ITM and can be used as salvage therapy.
10%的黑色素瘤患者会发生转移(ITM)。孤立肢体灌注(ILI)是治疗四肢不可切除 ITM 的成熟疗法,但尚未明确 ILI 的理想治疗顺序/线。本研究评估了 ILI 作为一线、二线或三线或更后线治疗的效果。
回顾性分析了 2006 年至 2023 年期间所有接受 ILI 治疗的不可切除 ITM 患者。
共纳入 130 例患者,女性占 61%,中位年龄为 71(31-89)岁。中位随访时间为 37.5 个月。ILI 作为一线治疗的患者占 80%(n=104),二线治疗的患者占 15%(n=19),三线或更后线治疗的患者占 5.4%(n=7)。ILI 作为任何治疗线的总缓解率(ORR)和完全缓解(CR)率分别为 74%和 41%。ILI 作为一线、二线或三线或更后线治疗的 ORR 分别为 78%、63%和 57%。ILI 作为一线、二线或三线或更后线治疗的 CR 率分别为 42%、37%和 43%。治疗线之间的 ORR、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期或无疾病生存期均无显著差异。ILI 作为一线、二线或三线或更后线治疗的中位 PFS 分别为 6.9、5.4 和 18 个月。
无论患者是否接受过不可切除 ITM 的先前治疗,ILI 治疗均有较好的反应。与后线 ILI 相比,一线 ILI 的 ORR 似乎更好。尽管样本量限制了统计学意义,但当 ILI 作为一线治疗与三线治疗相比时,ORR 提高了 21%,这具有临床意义。ILI 对不可切除黑色素瘤 ITM 有效,可作为挽救治疗。