Suppr超能文献

孤立肢体灌注作为转移性皮肤转移瘤的一线、二线或三线及以上治疗方法。

Isolated Limb Infusion as First, Second, or Third or Later-Line Therapy for Metastatic In-Transit Melanoma.

机构信息

University of South Florida Tampa, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.

Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241297326. doi: 10.1177/10732748241297326.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ten percent of patients with melanoma develop in-transit metastases (ITM). Isolated limb infusion (ILI) is a well-established therapy for unresectable ITM on the extremities, but the ideal sequencing/line of therapy of ILI has not been defined. This study evaluates ILI as first-line, second-line, or third or later-line therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective review included all patients with unresectable ITM who underwent ILI from 2006-2023.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients were identified, 61% female, median age of 71 (31-89) years. Median follow-up was 37.5 months. ILI was first-line therapy in 80% (n = 104), second-line in 15% (n = 19), and third or later-line in 5.4% (n = 7). Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates for ILI as any line of therapy were 74% and 41%, respectively. ORR for ILI as first, second, or third or later-line therapy were 78%, 63%, and 57%, respectively. CR rates for ILI as first, second, or third or later-line therapy were 42%, 37%, and 43%, respectively. There were no significant differences in ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, or disease-free survival between therapy lines. Median PFS for ILI as first, second, or third or later-line therapy were 6.9, 5.4, and 18 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients responded well to ILI, whether or not they received previous therapies for unresectable ITM. First-line ILI appears to have a better ORR than later lines of ILI. Although sample size limited statistical significance, there was a 21% improvement in ORR when ILI was used as first-line vs third-line therapy, which is clinically meaningful. ILI is effective for unresectable melanoma ITM and can be used as salvage therapy.

摘要

背景

10%的黑色素瘤患者会发生转移(ITM)。孤立肢体灌注(ILI)是治疗四肢不可切除 ITM 的成熟疗法,但尚未明确 ILI 的理想治疗顺序/线。本研究评估了 ILI 作为一线、二线或三线或更后线治疗的效果。

方法

回顾性分析了 2006 年至 2023 年期间所有接受 ILI 治疗的不可切除 ITM 患者。

结果

共纳入 130 例患者,女性占 61%,中位年龄为 71(31-89)岁。中位随访时间为 37.5 个月。ILI 作为一线治疗的患者占 80%(n=104),二线治疗的患者占 15%(n=19),三线或更后线治疗的患者占 5.4%(n=7)。ILI 作为任何治疗线的总缓解率(ORR)和完全缓解(CR)率分别为 74%和 41%。ILI 作为一线、二线或三线或更后线治疗的 ORR 分别为 78%、63%和 57%。ILI 作为一线、二线或三线或更后线治疗的 CR 率分别为 42%、37%和 43%。治疗线之间的 ORR、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期或无疾病生存期均无显著差异。ILI 作为一线、二线或三线或更后线治疗的中位 PFS 分别为 6.9、5.4 和 18 个月。

结论

无论患者是否接受过不可切除 ITM 的先前治疗,ILI 治疗均有较好的反应。与后线 ILI 相比,一线 ILI 的 ORR 似乎更好。尽管样本量限制了统计学意义,但当 ILI 作为一线治疗与三线治疗相比时,ORR 提高了 21%,这具有临床意义。ILI 对不可切除黑色素瘤 ITM 有效,可作为挽救治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecd7/11539175/3dbe46ad87c7/10.1177_10732748241297326-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验