Department of Ophthalmology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 5;14(1):26842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75289-1.
We investigated how long-term visual experience with habitual spherical aberration (SA) influences subjective depth of focus (DoF). Nine healthy cycloplegic eyes with habitual SAs of different signs and magnitudes were enrolled. An adaptive optics (AO) visual simulator was used to measure through-focus high-contrast visual acuity after correcting all monochromatic aberrations and imposing + 0.5 μm and - 0.5 μm SAs for a 6-mm pupil. The positive (n = 6) and negative (n = 3) habitual SA groups ranged from 0.17 to 0.8 μm and from - 1.2 to - 0.12 μm for a 6-mm pupil, respectively. Although all optical conditions were identical, and the subjective DoFs were expected to be the same for all participants, the DoFs of individuals differed between the positive and negative habitual SA groups. For the positive habitual SA group, the mean DoF with positive AO-induced SA (2.14 D) was larger than that with negative AO-induced SA (1.88 D); for the negative habitual SA group, a smaller DoF was measured with positive AO-induced SA (1.94 D) than that with negative AO-induced SA (2.14 D). Subjective DoF tended to be larger when the induced SA in terms of sign and magnitude was closer to the participant's habitual SA. Our findings suggest that neural adaptation to habitual SA compensated for optical blur at multiple object distances, perceptually expanding DoF. As a result, the outcomes of optical treatments for presbyopia may differ due to the neural compensation mechanism influenced by an individual's visual experience with their habitual optics.
我们研究了长期习惯性球差(SA)视觉体验如何影响主观景深(DoF)。纳入了 9 只健康的麻痹眼,其习惯性 SA 具有不同的符号和幅度。使用自适应光学(AO)视觉模拟器在矫正所有单色像差并施加+0.5μm和-0.5μm SA 后测量 6mm 瞳孔的聚焦高对比度视力。正(n=6)和负(n=3)习惯性 SA 组的范围分别为 0.17μm 至 0.8μm和-1.2μm 至-0.12μm。尽管所有光学条件相同,并且预计所有参与者的主观 DoF 相同,但个体的 DoF 在正、负习惯性 SA 组之间存在差异。对于正习惯性 SA 组,正 AO 诱导的 SA(2.14D)的平均 DoF 大于负 AO 诱导的 SA(1.88D);对于负习惯性 SA 组,正 AO 诱导的 SA(1.94D)的 DoF 小于负 AO 诱导的 SA(2.14D)。当诱导 SA 的符号和幅度与参与者的习惯性 SA 更接近时,主观 DoF 往往更大。我们的发现表明,神经适应习惯性 SA 补偿了多个物体距离的光学模糊,在感知上扩大了 DoF。因此,由于个体视觉体验对习惯性光学的神经补偿机制的影响,老视的光学治疗结果可能会有所不同。