Prakash Atul, Truong Julie, Adelakun Adeniyi, Singh Ravnit
Division of Cardiology, St. Mary's General Hospital, Passaic, NJ, USA.
Division of Internal Medicine, St. Mary's General Hospital, Passaic, NJ, USA.
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2024 Oct 15;15(10):6047-6051. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2024.15101. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Head-up tilt testing (HUT) has been used for decades in the work-up of patients presenting with syncope and a suspected reflex etiology. Different protocols have been used with varying sensitivity and specificity. The standard protocols are relatively long, with various maneuvers employed to elicit a response and potentially abbreviate the test. The role of carotid sinus massage (CSM) as a provocative maneuver has not been well studied. The objective of this study was to assess whether CSM could predict the outcome of HUT. Fifty consecutive patients who had been referred for head-up tilt table testing were prospectively enrolled in the study. All patients underwent an identical protocol that involved provocation with CSM both initially in the supine posture and at the end of 30 min of HUT. Seventeen out of 50 (34%) patients ultimately had a positive tilt table test result. Fifteen of these 17 patients had a significant vasodepressor response (symptomatic blood pressure drop of >20 mmHg) without significant bradycardia (heart rate of <50 bpm) during the initial CSM in the supine posture. Of the 33 patients with a negative tilt table result, none had a vasodepressor response to CSM. The sensitivity of CSM in detecting a patient who would ultimately have a positive tilt table test was 88.24% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.56%-98.54%), while the specificity was 100% (95% CI, 89.42%-100.00%). CSM performed in the supine posture at the beginning of a tilt table test was highly sensitive and specific for the outcome of the test after completion of the entire protocol. Based on these findings, CSM may obviate the need for completion of the protocol for diagnostic reasons.
几十年来,头高位倾斜试验(HUT)一直用于对出现晕厥且疑似反射性病因的患者进行检查。不同的方案被采用,其敏感性和特异性各不相同。标准方案相对较长,采用了各种操作来引发反应并可能缩短检查时间。颈动脉窦按摩(CSM)作为一种激发性操作的作用尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是评估CSM是否能预测HUT的结果。五十名连续被转诊进行头高位倾斜试验的患者被前瞻性纳入本研究。所有患者都接受了相同的方案,该方案包括在仰卧位初始时以及HUT 30分钟结束时进行CSM激发。50名患者中有17名(34%)最终倾斜试验结果为阳性。这17名患者中有15名在仰卧位初始CSM期间出现显著的血管减压反应(症状性血压下降>20 mmHg)且无显著心动过缓(心率<50次/分钟)。在33名倾斜试验结果为阴性的患者中,没有人对CSM有血管减压反应。CSM检测最终倾斜试验结果为阳性患者的敏感性为88.24%(95%置信区间[CI],63.56%-98.54%),而特异性为100%(95%CI,89.42%-100.00%)。在倾斜试验开始时仰卧位进行的CSM对于整个方案完成后的试验结果具有高度敏感性和特异性。基于这些发现,出于诊断目的,CSM可能无需完成整个方案。