Rajyaguru Purusharth I
Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India.
BBA Adv. 2024 Oct 11;6:100122. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadva.2024.100122. eCollection 2024.
Every kid starts out as a natural-born scientist, and then we beat it out of them. A few trickle through the system with their wonder and enthusiasm for science intact - Carl Sagan. This statement, made decades ago, still rings true. The teaching philosophy and methodology adopted by teachers around the world, in general, are often blamed for such an outcome. Who better to fix this teaching problem than the scientists themselves? People actively experimenting with different aspects of science are best placed to explain the fundamentals of science to ignite and sustain enthusiasm towards science. Although active scientists (researchers in laboratories) may find it challenging to teach science to school kids regularly, it would be ideally in their domain to teach the bright students they encounter in the classrooms at their university/institute. This brings me to the topic of this essay's discussion about whether scientists should only focus on research or contribute to teaching as well.
每个孩子生来都是天生的科学家,然后我们把这种特质从他们身上磨灭了。少数人带着对科学完好无损的好奇与热情从教育体系中脱颖而出——卡尔·萨根。几十年前的这番言论如今依然正确。总体而言,世界各地教师所采用的教学理念和方法常被归咎于这样的结果。还有谁比科学家自己更适合解决这个教学问题呢?积极参与科学各方面实验的人最有资格讲解科学基础知识,以点燃并维持对科学的热情。尽管活跃的科学家(实验室研究人员)可能觉得定期给小学生教授科学颇具挑战,但在大学/研究所课堂上遇到的聪明学生则理想地处于他们的教学范围内。这就引出了本文要讨论的话题:科学家是应该只专注于研究,还是也应该投身教学。