• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Functional Outcome of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur Treated With Standard Surgical Modalities.采用标准手术方式治疗的股骨转子间骨折的功能结局
Cureus. 2024 Oct 5;16(10):e70909. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70909. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Comparison of radiological and functional outcome of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures treated using PFN and PFNA-2 in patients with osteoporosis.骨质疏松症患者中使用PFN和PFNA-2治疗不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的放射学和功能结果比较。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Jul;29(5):1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02401-x. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
3
A Comparative Study of Functional Outcome Following Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur.动力髋螺钉与股骨近端髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折后功能结果的比较研究
Cureus. 2022 Apr 4;14(4):e23803. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23803. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
Surgical and Functional Outcomes of the Results of Conventional Two-Screw Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) Versus Helical-Blade Anti-rotation Proximal Femoral Nail (PFNA2).传统双螺钉股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)与螺旋刀片抗旋股骨近端髓内钉(PFNA2)手术及功能结果对比
Cureus. 2023 Aug 18;15(8):e43698. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43698. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Comparison of Twin Screw Derotation Type Versus Single Helical Blade Type Cephalomedullary Nail in the Management of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures.双螺旋去旋型与单螺旋刀片型股骨近端髓内钉治疗不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的比较
Cureus. 2024 Jun 4;16(6):e61638. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61638. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Surgical Treatment of Type 31-A1 Two-part Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: Is Proximal Femoral Nail Superior to Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation?31-A1型两部分股骨转子间骨折的手术治疗:股骨近端髓内钉是否优于动力髋螺钉固定?
Cureus. 2019 Feb 20;11(2):e4110. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4110.
7
Outcomes of dynamic hip screw augmented with trochanteric wiring for treatment of unstable type A2 intertrochanteric femur fractures.动力髋螺钉联合粗隆部钢丝内固定治疗不稳定型A2型股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效
Injury. 2017 Aug;48 Suppl 2:S72-S77. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30498-9.
8
Type II Intertrochanteric Fractures: Proximal Femoral Nailing (PFN) Versus Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS).II型粗隆间骨折:股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)与动力髋螺钉(DHS)的比较
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016 Jan;4(1):23-8.
9
Functional recovery of elderly patients with surgically-treated intertrochanteric fractures: preliminary results of a randomised trial comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail techniques.手术治疗股骨转子间骨折老年患者的功能恢复:比较动力髋螺钉和股骨近端髓内钉技术的随机试验初步结果
Injury. 2014 Nov;45 Suppl 5:S26-31. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(14)70017-8.
10
Comparison of functional and radiological outcome of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures treated using PFN and PFNA in patients with osteoporosis.骨质疏松症患者使用股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)和股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)治疗不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的功能和影像学结果比较
J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 Oct;14(10):219-224. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i10.4870.

本文引用的文献

1
An innovative scoring system for predicting an excellent Harris hip score after proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture.一种用于预测老年股骨转子间骨折患者股骨近端防旋髓内钉术后 Harris 髋关节评分优秀的创新评分系统。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 19;12(1):19939. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24177-7.
2
Customised proximal femoral nail in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture with ipsilateral femoral shaft malunion: A case report.定制型股骨近端髓内钉治疗合并同侧股骨干畸形愈合的股骨转子间骨折:1例病例报告
Trauma Case Rep. 2020 Jul 29;29:100348. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2020.100348. eCollection 2020 Oct.
3
Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture-a finite element analysis.三种不同内固定植入物治疗股骨颈骨折的比较——有限元分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Mar 12;14(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1097-x.
4
Comparing the Intramedullary Nail and Extramedullary Fixation in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures.髓内钉与髓外固定治疗不稳定型转子间骨折的比较。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 2;8(1):2321. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20717-2.
5
The haematoma and its role in bone healing.血肿及其在骨愈合中的作用。
J Exp Orthop. 2017 Dec;4(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40634-017-0079-3. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
6
The clinical results of a novel method for minimal invasive dynamic hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric fractures compared to the conventional one.一种用于微创动力髋螺钉固定转子间骨折的新方法与传统方法的临床结果比较。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Oct;43(5):627-635. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0690-5. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
7
Comparative prospective study of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture femur.股骨近端髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的比较前瞻性研究
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jun;3(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
8
Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support: a key element in stability reconstruction for the unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures.具有正向内侧皮质支撑的骨折复位:不稳定型股骨转子间髋部骨折稳定性重建的关键要素。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):811-8. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2206-x. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
9
Geographic and ethnic disparities in osteoporotic fractures.骨质疏松性骨折的地域和种族差异。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014 Jun;10(6):338-51. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2014.51. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
10
Is the lag screw sliding effective in the intramedullary nailing in A1 and A2 AO-OTA intertrochanteric fractures? A prospective study of Sliding and None-sliding lag screw in Gamma-III nail.交锁髓内钉治疗 A1 和 A2AO-OTA 转子间骨折时滑动螺钉是否有效?Gamma-III 钉中滑动与非滑动交锁螺钉的前瞻性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Sep 1;20:60. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-60.

采用标准手术方式治疗的股骨转子间骨折的功能结局

Functional Outcome of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur Treated With Standard Surgical Modalities.

作者信息

Argekar Harshad, Dole Ganesh, Shinde Mahesh, Patel Mihir, Patil Yogeshwari H, Sharma Atharva, Sarwey Kshitij, Datta Renema, Modi Arnav, Sathe Sakshi

机构信息

Orthopaedics, Hinduhridaysamrat Balasaheb Thackeray Medical College and Dr. R.N. Cooper Muncipal General Hospital, Mumbai, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Oct 5;16(10):e70909. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70909. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.70909
PMID:39502978
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11534892/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Among the most prevalent injuries among the elderly with trivial trauma are trochanteric fractures. Osteoporosis and female sex are additional risk factors. The patient's age, the fracture, their overall health, the amount of time between the fracture and treatment, the effectiveness of the treatment, any concurrent medical care, and the stability of the fixation all affect how well the patient responds to treatment. For its fixation, various implants are used. The main aim of this study is to assess the functional outcome in intertrochanteric fractures using the Harris Hip Scoring in intertrochanteric fractures.

METHOD

Patients presenting with intertrochanteric femur fracture were evaluated. Written consent was taken from the patient. Radiographic data were collected. Complications and varus collapse evaluated. Functional outcome was assessed with the Harris Hip Scoring system.

RESULTS

The proportion of excellent Harris Hip Evaluation (HHE) scores was the highest in proximal femur nail (PFNA2) at six months follow-up examination, which was 11 (57.19%) more than any method. In the incidence of varus deformity, the proportion was maximum in the case of the dynamic hip screw (DHS) with three patients (33.33%), followed by PFN in 11 patients (28.95%), and the least for PFNA2 in three patients (15.79%).

CONCLUSION

The mean operative time was lower in the PFN A2 group, and the HHE score values were higher than those of PFN and DHS. This study concludes that these implants have a comparable radiological and functional outcome for unstable intertrochanteric fracture except for less surgical time and blood loss in PFN A2.

摘要

引言

在受轻微创伤的老年人中,转子间骨折是最常见的损伤之一。骨质疏松和女性性别是额外的风险因素。患者的年龄、骨折情况、整体健康状况、骨折与治疗之间的时间间隔、治疗效果、任何并发的医疗护理以及固定的稳定性都会影响患者对治疗的反应程度。对于其固定,使用了各种植入物。本研究的主要目的是使用转子间骨折的Harris髋关节评分来评估转子间骨折的功能结果。

方法

对出现股骨转子间骨折的患者进行评估。获得了患者的书面同意。收集了放射学数据。评估了并发症和内翻塌陷情况。使用Harris髋关节评分系统评估功能结果。

结果

在六个月的随访检查中,股骨近端髓内钉(PFNA2)的Harris髋关节评估(HHE)优秀评分比例最高,比任何方法都多11例(57.19%)。在内翻畸形发生率方面,动力髋螺钉(DHS)的比例最高,有3例患者(33.33%),其次是PFN,有11例患者(28.95%),而PFNA2最少,有3例患者(15.79%)。

结论

PFN A2组的平均手术时间较短,HHE评分值高于PFN和DHS。本研究得出结论,对于不稳定的转子间骨折,除了PFN A2手术时间较短和失血量较少外,这些植入物在放射学和功能结果方面具有可比性。