Qaiser Shehrbano, Noman Maham, Khan Muhammad Sheharyar, Ahmed Umer Waseem, Arif Aamna
Surgical Emergency, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, GBR.
Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 6;16(10):e70923. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70923. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Surgical safety remains a critical aspect of modern healthcare, particularly as the number of surgical procedures continues to rise, placing greater demands on resources and increasing the potential for errors. In response to this challenge, various mitigation strategies have been implemented to improve operative outcomes. One such strategy, introduced by the WHO in 2008, is the Surgical Safety Checklist. Despite its widespread adoption globally, its acceptance remains limited in developing countries. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, specifically the sign-in, time-out, and sign-out components, on reducing post-operative adverse effects in surgical patients. A single-step search strategy was employed across multiple databases, including Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Database, ProQuest, Index Copernicus, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Additionally, reference lists of identified reports and articles were manually searched to identify further relevant studies. Only studies published in English before September 2022 that focused exclusively on the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist were included. Studies on other checklists or those with confounding factors, such as international surgical outcomes studies, were excluded from this analysis. After screening 17,821 publications based on their titles and abstracts, 93 studies met the initial inclusion criteria and underwent full retrieval and assessment for methodological quality. Ultimately, 13 studies were deemed of sufficient quality to be included in the review. Among these, 10 studies reported outcomes related to complication rates, with nine of them demonstrating a decrease in complication rates following checklist implementation. Similarly, 13 studies reported outcomes related to mortality rates, with 12 reporting a decrease in mortality rates associated with checklist use. In conclusion, the application of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist has been shown to improve surgical outcomes by reducing post-operative adverse effects, including mortality and complication rates. However, further research is warranted to assess the checklist's impact on the quality of life of surgical patients, which would contribute to enhancing its overall acceptability. Continued investigation into these areas will help further strengthen the evidence supporting the widespread adoption and effective implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist across diverse healthcare settings globally.
手术安全仍然是现代医疗保健的一个关键方面,尤其是随着手术数量持续增加,对资源的需求更大,出错的可能性也在增加。为应对这一挑战,已实施了各种缓解策略以改善手术效果。世界卫生组织(WHO)于2008年推出的手术安全核对表就是这样一种策略。尽管它在全球范围内得到广泛采用,但在发展中国家,其接受程度仍然有限。本系统评价旨在评估WHO手术安全核对表,特别是签到、暂停和签出部分,对降低手术患者术后不良反应的影响。采用单步检索策略在多个数据库中进行检索,包括Medline、CINAHL、Embase、Cochrane数据库、ProQuest、哥白尼索引、谷歌学术和Scopus。此外,还手动检索了已识别报告和文章的参考文献列表,以识别更多相关研究。仅纳入2022年9月之前发表的、专门关注WHO手术安全核对表的英文研究。关于其他核对表或存在混杂因素的研究,如国际手术结果研究,均被排除在本分析之外。在根据标题和摘要筛选了17821篇出版物后,93项研究符合初步纳入标准,并对其进行了全面检索和方法学质量评估。最终,13项研究被认为质量足够高,可以纳入该评价。其中,10项研究报告了与并发症发生率相关的结果,其中9项表明实施核对表后并发症发生率有所下降。同样,13项研究报告了与死亡率相关的结果,12项报告使用核对表后死亡率有所下降。总之,已证明应用WHO手术安全核对表可通过减少术后不良反应,包括死亡率和并发症发生率,来改善手术效果。然而,有必要进一步研究评估核对表对手术患者生活质量的影响,这将有助于提高其总体可接受性。对这些领域的持续研究将有助于进一步加强支持在全球不同医疗环境中广泛采用和有效实施WHO手术安全核对表的证据。