Suppr超能文献

QuickSleeper 骨内注射 4% 阿替卡因用于治疗有症状不可复性牙髓炎下颌第一磨牙的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

Efficacy of QuickSleeper Intraosseous Injection of 4% Articaine in Mandibular First Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

出版信息

Anesth Prog. 2024 Sep 9;71(3):123-130. doi: 10.2344/363591.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine via primary intraosseous (IO) injection with the QuickSleeper device vs inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) for mandibular first molars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (SIP).

METHODS

Sixty-four patients with a first mandibular molar with SIP were randomly divided into 2 groups: IO (n = 32) and IANB (n = 32). Each received either an IO injection with the 5th generation QuickSleeper device or a conventional IANB with 1.7 mL 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Success was defined as no/mild pain upon the access cavity preparation and initial filing. Injection pain, anesthetic onset, heart rate (HR) change, HR recovery time, and duration of anesthesia were also recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The success rates were 40.6% for IANB and 81.2% for IO (P < .001). IO exhibited a significantly lower injection pain (P = .027), a shorter onset of action (P < .001), a greater heart rate increase (P < .001), a faster heart rate recovery time (P < .001), and a shorter duration of action (P < .001) vs IANB.

CONCLUSION

Primary IO anesthesia using the fifth generation of the QuickSleeper device was more successful than IANB when using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine to anesthetize mandibular first molars with SIP. The QuickSleeper device appeared to be a viable alternative to IANB for mandibular anesthesia.

摘要

目的

评估第五代 QuickSleeper 设备经初步骨内(IO)注射 4%阿替卡因加 1:100000 肾上腺素与下齿槽神经阻滞(IANB)用于诊断为症状性不可复性牙髓炎(SIP)的下颌第一磨牙的麻醉效果。

方法

将 64 例 SIP 的下颌第一磨牙患者随机分为 2 组:IO 组(n = 32)和 IANB 组(n = 32)。每组分别接受 5 代 QuickSleeper 设备的 IO 注射或 1.7 mL 4%阿替卡因加 1:100000 肾上腺素的常规 IANB。成功定义为在制备开髓洞和初始锉削时无/轻度疼痛。还记录并分析了注射疼痛、麻醉起效时间、心率(HR)变化、HR 恢复时间和麻醉持续时间。

结果

IANB 的成功率为 40.6%,IO 的成功率为 81.2%(P <.001)。IO 表现出明显较低的注射疼痛(P =.027)、较短的起效时间(P <.001)、更大的心率增加(P <.001)、更快的心率恢复时间(P <.001)和较短的作用持续时间(P <.001)比 IANB。

结论

当使用 4%阿替卡因加 1:100000 肾上腺素麻醉 SIP 的下颌第一磨牙时,第五代 QuickSleeper 设备的初步 IO 麻醉比 IANB 更成功。QuickSleeper 设备似乎是 IANB 用于下颌麻醉的可行替代方案。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验