Suppr超能文献

下牙槽神经阻滞用于治疗不可逆性牙髓炎患牙:文献系统评价与Meta分析

Inferior alveolar nerve block for the treatment of teeth presenting with irreversible pulpitis: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Corbella Stefano, Taschieri Silvio, Mannocci Francesco, Rosen Eyal, Tsesis Igor, Del Fabbro Massimo

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 2017;48(1):69-82. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a37131.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present systematic review was to evaluate, in patients with irreversible pulpitis affecting mandibular posterior teeth, if premedication with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can increase the efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) if compared to placebo administration; if one anesthetic agent is more effective than another; if 1.8 mL injection is more effective than 3.6 mL injection to increase the efficacy of IANB; and if supplementary buccal injection is able to increase the efficacy of IANB as compared to a negative control/placebo group.

DATA SOURCES

Randomized controlled clinical trials investigating different aspects (technique, premedication with anti-inflammatory drugs, different anesthetic agents) were searched. Success of IANB, as defined in the studies, was considered as the primary outcome. A meta-analysis was performed evaluating relative risks (RRs). Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central) were searched after preparation of an appropriate search string. After application of selection criteria, a total of 37 studies were included; 19 of them were considered in the meta-analysis. There was evidence of a difference in favor of the use of premedication with anti-inflammatory drugs (RR, 1.80; CI 95%, 1.50-2.14; P < .0001). There was no evidence of a difference between articaine and lidocaine (RR, 1.05; CI 95%, 0.91-1.21; P = .94). With regard to the volume of anesthetic infiltrated, the computed RR was 1.17 (CI, 0.73-1.88) without any significant difference between the use of one or two cartridges (P = .52). The estimated RR for a supplementary buccal infiltration was 1.56 (CI, 1.00-2.42; P = .05).

CONCLUSION

The use of premedication with anti-inflammatory drugs before IANB can increase the efficacy of the IANB. The type of anesthetic agent, the volume of anesthetic, and the use of a supplemental buccal infiltration do not seem to affect the efficacy of anesthesia.

摘要

目的

本系统评价的目的是评估,在患有不可逆性牙髓炎的下颌后牙患者中,与给予安慰剂相比,使用非甾体抗炎药进行术前用药是否能提高下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)的效果;一种麻醉剂是否比另一种更有效;1.8 mL注射量是否比3.6 mL注射量更能提高IANB的效果;以及与阴性对照/安慰剂组相比,补充颊侧注射是否能提高IANB的效果。

数据来源

检索了调查不同方面(技术、使用抗炎药进行术前用药、不同麻醉剂)的随机对照临床试验。研究中定义的IANB成功被视为主要结局。进行了一项荟萃分析以评估相对风险(RRs)。在准备好适当的检索词后,检索了电子数据库(Medline、Embase、Cochrane Central)。应用选择标准后,共纳入37项研究;其中19项被纳入荟萃分析。有证据表明使用抗炎药进行术前用药存在差异(RR,1.80;95% CI,1.50 - 2.14;P <.0001)。没有证据表明阿替卡因和利多卡因之间存在差异(RR,1.05;95% CI,0.91 - 1.21;P =.94)。关于浸润麻醉剂的体积,计算出的RR为1.17(CI,0.73 - 1.88),使用一支或两支药筒之间没有任何显著差异(P =.52)。补充颊侧浸润的估计RR为1.56(CI,1.00 - 2.42;P =.05)。

结论

IANB术前使用抗炎药进行术前用药可提高IANB的效果。麻醉剂类型、麻醉剂体积和补充颊侧浸润的使用似乎不影响麻醉效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验