School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;247:108627. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108627. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
Cervical arterial dissection (CeAD) is a leading cause of stroke in young adults with an early presentation often mimicking musculoskeletal pain. Currently, no validated tests exist and CAD may be missed. A diagnostic support tool could help guide urgent referral for imaging, when to monitor, or when safe to proceed with treatment, and ultimately help stroke prevention.
To validate a 4-criteria diagnostic support tool for early recognition of CeAD in primary care, to refine tool descriptors as needed, and propose optimal cut-offs for clinical application.
Prospective observational study METHOD: Participants with radiologically confirmed CeAD and controls without CeAD were identified from adults >18 years presenting to a tertiary metropolitan hospital with initial diagnosis of headache or neck pain. All were scored with criteria out of7 (acute onset pain [2], recent trauma/infection [1], neurological features [2], age <55 years [2]). Diagnostic values were calculated to determine cut offs and the tool was refined based on the analysis.
Thirty participants with CeAD and 261 controls with non-CeAD causes of headache and neck pain were included. The diagnostic support tool was an 'excellent' predictor of CeAD (AUC 0.83) but demonstrated poor specificity. Refining the tool to 'acute/sudden onset' [1], 'unusual/unfamiliar headache/neck pain' [1], recent trauma/infection [1] and neurological features ≥2 [1], scored out of 4, showed 100 % sensitivity and 74 % specificity to detect CeAD at a cut-off of 3/4 (AUC 0.87).
The refined tool shows acceptable clinical utility at a cut-off ≥3, where referral for vascular imaging is recommended. Further validation in Emergency and primary care is needed.
颈内动脉夹层(CeAD)是年轻成年人中风的主要原因,其早期表现常类似于肌肉骨骼疼痛。目前,尚无经过验证的检查方法,可能会漏诊 CAD。诊断支持工具可以帮助指导对影像学的紧急转诊,何时进行监测,或者何时可以安全地进行治疗,从而最终有助于预防中风。
验证一种用于在初级保健中早期识别 CeAD 的四项标准诊断支持工具,根据需要细化工具描述,并提出用于临床应用的最佳截止值。
前瞻性观察性研究
从成年患者中确定了经放射学确诊的 CeAD 患者和没有 CeAD 的对照组,这些患者最初诊断为头痛或颈痛就诊于一家三级大都市医院。所有患者均根据 7 项标准进行评分(急性发作疼痛[2],近期创伤/感染[1],神经系统表现[2],年龄<55 岁[2])。计算诊断值以确定截止值,并根据分析结果对工具进行细化。
共纳入 30 例 CeAD 患者和 261 例因头痛和颈痛而非 CeAD 原因就诊的对照组。该诊断支持工具是 CeAD 的“优秀”预测指标(AUC 0.83),但特异性较差。将工具细化为“急性/突然发作”[1],“不寻常/不熟悉的头痛/颈痛”[1],近期创伤/感染[1]和神经系统表现≥2[1],评分总计 4 分,在截止值为 3/4 时,该工具具有 100%的敏感性和 74%的特异性来检测 CeAD(AUC 0.87)。
在截止值≥3 时,细化后的工具显示出可接受的临床实用性,建议对此类患者进行血管成像转诊。还需要在急诊和初级保健中进一步验证。