Suppr超能文献

髋关节骨性活动范围(BROM)的模拟与纯屈曲、深屈时内旋以及最小屈伸时外旋的观察到的功能活动范围(FROM)相对应——一项尸体研究。

Simulation of hip bony range of motion (BROM) corresponds to the observed functional range of motion (FROM) for pure flexion, internal rotation in deep flexion, and external rotation in minimal flexion-extension - A cadaver study.

机构信息

WMG, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

WMG, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

出版信息

Comput Biol Med. 2024 Dec;183:109270. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109270. Epub 2024 Nov 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study investigated the relationship between computed bony range of motion (BROM) and actual functional range of motion (FROM) as directly measured in cadaveric hips. The hypothesis was that some hip movements are not substantially restricted by soft tissues, and therefore, computed BROM for these movements may effectively represent FROM, providing a reliable parameter for computational pre-operative planning.

METHODS

Maximum passive FROM was measured in nine cadaveric hips using optical tracking. Each hip was measured in at least ninety FROM positions, covering flexion, extension, abduction, flexion-internal rotation (IR), flexion-external rotation (ER), extension-IR, and extension-ER movements. The measured FROM was virtually recreated using 3D models of the femur and pelvis derived from CT scans, and the corresponding BROM was computed. The relationship between FROM and BROM was classified into three groups: close (mean difference<5°), moderate (mean difference 5-15°), and weak (mean difference>15°).

RESULTS

The relationship between FROM and BROM was close for pure flexion (difference = 3.1° ± 3.9°) and IR in deep (>70°) flexion (difference = 4.3° ± 4.6°). The relationship was moderate for ER in minimal flexion (difference = 10.3° ± 5.8°) and ER in minimal extension (difference = 11.7° ± 7.2°). Bony impingement was observed in some cases during these movements. Other movements showed a weak relationship: large differences were observed in extension (51.9° ± 14.4°), abduction (18.6° ± 11.3°), flexion-IR at flexion<70° (37.1° ± 9.4°), extension-IR (79.6° ± 4.8°), flexion-ER at flexion>30° (45.9° ± 11.3°), and extension-ER at extension>20° (15.8° ± 4.8°).

CONCLUSION

BROM simulations of hip flexion, IR in deep flexion, and ER in low flexion/extension may be useful in dynamic pre-operative planning of total hip arthroplasty.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨通过尸体髋关节直接测量计算得到的骨性运动范围(BROM)与实际功能运动范围(FROM)之间的关系。假设某些髋关节运动不受软组织的显著限制,因此,这些运动的计算 BROM 可能有效代表 FROM,为计算术前规划提供可靠参数。

方法

使用光学跟踪仪测量九具尸体髋关节的最大被动 FROM。每具髋关节的 FROM 测量至少 90 个位置,涵盖屈曲、伸展、外展、屈曲内旋(IR)、屈曲外旋(ER)、伸展 IR 和伸展 ER 运动。使用从 CT 扫描获得的股骨和骨盆 3D 模型虚拟重建测量的 FROM,并计算相应的 BROM。根据 FROM 和 BROM 的差异,将两者之间的关系分为三组:紧密(平均差异<5°)、中度(平均差异 5-15°)和弱(平均差异>15°)。

结果

纯屈曲(差异=3.1°±3.9°)和深度屈曲(IR>70°)时的 IR 与 FROM 关系紧密。最小屈曲时的 ER(差异=10.3°±5.8°)和最小伸展时的 ER(差异=11.7°±7.2°)与 FROM 关系中度。在这些运动中,一些情况下观察到骨性撞击。其他运动则表现出较弱的关系:伸展(51.9°±14.4°)、外展(18.6°±11.3°)、屈曲<70°时的 IR(37.1°±9.4°)、伸展 IR(79.6°±4.8°)、屈曲>30°时的 ER(45.9°±11.3°)和伸展>20°时的 ER(15.8°±4.8°)之间的差异较大。

结论

髋关节屈曲、深度屈曲时的 IR 和低屈曲/伸展时的 ER 的 BROM 模拟可能有助于全髋关节置换术的动态术前规划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验