Suppr超能文献

系统评价与Meta分析:抽动秽语障碍药物随机对照试验中的安慰剂反应

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Placebo Response in Randomized Controlled Trials of Tourette's Disorder Medications.

作者信息

Macul Ferreira de Barros Pedro, Farhat Luis C, Behling Emily, Nasir Madeeha, Landeros-Weisenberger Angeli, Bloch Michael H

机构信息

Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 May;64(5):577-592. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.011. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the magnitude of placebo response in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of medications for Tourette's disorder.

METHOD

CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, WHO ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched up to September, 2023 to identify placebo-controlled RCTs assessing pharmacological interventions for Tourette's disorder. Standardized mean change and standardized mean difference were calculated for within-group (placebo, drug) and between-group (drug-placebo) change in tics. Data were pooled in random-effects meta-analysis. Meta-regressions were performed to identify study-level characteristics that could be differentially associated with placebo, drug, and drug-placebo response.

RESULTS

Literature searches identified 13,775 records, and 50 RCTs involving 1,566 participants were included in the placebo meta-analysis. Placebo response was medium to large (standardized mean change: -0.62; 95% CI: -0.75, -0.5; I = 76%; τ = 0.14). Several factors were associated with larger placebo responses (eg, non-US RCT, industry sponsorship, number of centers and participants). However, there was a moderate-to-high correlation between placebo and drug response (ρ = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.79), and factors associated with larger placebo response were also generally associated with larger drug responses. There was not a significant correlation between placebo response and drug-placebo differences (ρ = -0.05; 95% CI: -0.32, 0.22), and factors associated with larger placebo response generally did not interfere in drug-placebo differences.

CONCLUSION

The magnitude of placebo response in Tourette's disorder may be large, but similar to that in other child and adolescent psychiatric conditions. Clinical researchers may manipulate study-level factors to diminish placebo response (eg, carefully selecting study sites and keeping them at the minimum feasibility). However, drug-placebo differences may not increase as drug response will likely diminish as well.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

This study utilized data from 50 placebo-controlled clinical trials involving 1,566 participants of medicines for Tourette's disorder to determine the magnitude and correlates of improvement during treatment with placebo. Individuals in the placebo arm experienced considerable improvement throughout the duration of clinical trials, and there were also several study-level factors that were associated with greater improvement in the placebo arm. However, those factors were also generally associated with larger improvement in the drug arm and did not interfere with drug-placebo differences, which inform whether treatments were efficacious or not. The findings are relevant for designing and conducting pharmacological randomized controlled trials in Tourette's disorder.

STUDY PREREGISTRATION INFORMATION

Comparative Efficacy, Tolerability, and Acceptability of Pharmacological Interventions for Chronic Tic Disorders Including Tourette's Syndrome in Children, Adolescents, and Adults: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022296975 DIVERSITY & INCLUSION STATEMENT: One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science.

摘要

目的

研究治疗抽动秽语综合征药物的随机对照试验(RCT)中安慰剂反应的程度。

方法

检索CENTRAL、Embase、PubMed、PsycInfo、Web of Science、WHO ICTRP和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库至2023年9月,以识别评估抽动秽语综合征药物干预的安慰剂对照RCT。计算抽动症状组内(安慰剂、药物)和组间(药物-安慰剂)变化的标准化平均变化和标准化平均差异。数据采用随机效应荟萃分析进行汇总。进行荟萃回归以确定可能与安慰剂、药物和药物-安慰剂反应存在差异关联的研究水平特征。

结果

文献检索共识别出13775条记录,50项RCT(涉及1566名参与者)被纳入安慰剂荟萃分析。安慰剂反应为中度至高度(标准化平均变化:-0.62;95%置信区间:-0.75,-0.5;I² = 76%;τ² = 0.14)。几个因素与更大的安慰剂反应相关(例如,非美国的RCT、行业赞助、中心数量和参与者数量)。然而,安慰剂和药物反应之间存在中度至高度相关性(ρ = 0.66;95%置信区间:0.47,0.79),与更大安慰剂反应相关的因素通常也与更大的药物反应相关。安慰剂反应与药物-安慰剂差异之间无显著相关性(ρ = -0.05;95%置信区间:-0.32,0.22),与更大安慰剂反应相关的因素通常不会干扰药物-安慰剂差异。

结论

抽动秽语综合征中安慰剂反应的程度可能较大,但与其他儿童和青少年精神疾病中的情况类似。临床研究人员可以操纵研究水平因素以减少安慰剂反应(例如,仔细选择研究地点并将其保持在最低可行性水平)。然而,药物-安慰剂差异可能不会增加,因为药物反应可能也会减弱。

通俗易懂的总结

本研究利用了50项涉及1566名抽动秽语综合征药物安慰剂对照临床试验的数据,以确定治疗期间安慰剂改善的程度及其相关因素。安慰剂组的个体在整个临床试验期间经历了显著改善,并且还有几个研究水平因素与安慰剂组更大的改善相关。然而,这些因素通常也与药物组更大的改善相关,并且不会干扰药物-安慰剂差异,而药物-安慰剂差异可表明治疗是否有效。这些发现与设计和开展抽动秽语综合征的药理学随机对照试验相关。

研究预注册信息

儿童、青少年和成人慢性抽动障碍包括抽动秽语综合征的药物干预的比较疗效、耐受性和可接受性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022296975 多样性与包容性声明:本文的一位或多位作者自我认定为科学领域中一个或多个历史上代表性不足的性和/或性别群体的成员。本文的一位或多位作者自我认定为科学领域中一个或多个历史上代表性不足的种族和/或族裔群体的成员。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验