Daher Mohammad, Daniels Alan H, Knebel Ashley, Balmaceno-Criss Mariah, Lafage Renaud, Lenke Lawrence G, Ames Chrisotpher P, Burton Douglas, Lewis Stephen M, Klineberg Eric O, Eastlack Robert K, Gupta Munish C, Mundis Gregory M, Gum Jeffrey L, Hamilton Kojo D, Hostin Richard, Passias Peter G, Protopsaltis Themistocles S, Kebaish Khaled M, Kim Han Jo, Schwab Frank, Shaffrey Christopher I, Smith Justin S, Line Breton, Bess Shay, Lafage Virginie, Diebo Bassel G
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Apr 15;50(8):508-514. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005206. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.
This study evaluates the impact of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and knee arthroplasty on alignments and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMS) of patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) corrective surgery.
The relationship between knee OA and spinal alignment in patients with ASD is incompletely understood. It is also unknown how patients with knee arthroplasty and ASD compare to ASD patients with native knees.
Baseline full-body radiographs were used, and hip and knee OA were graded by two independent reviewers using the KL classification. Spinopelvic parameters and PROMs were compared across the different knee OA groups and compared between patients with knee replacement and native knees.
One hundred ninety-nine patients with bilateral nonsevere OA (G1), 31 patients with unilateral severe knee OA (G2), and 60 patients with bilateral severe knee OA (G3). Patients with severe knee OA presented with worse spinopelvic parameters. However, after multivariable regression analysis controlling for age, frailty, PI, T1PA, knee OA was an independent predictor of knee flexion (G1: -0.02±7.3, G2: 7.8±9.4, G3: 4.5±8.7, P <0.001), and ankle dorsiflexion (G1: 2.3±4.0, G2: 6.6±4.5, G3: 5.1±4.1, P <0.001). There was no difference in PROMs ( P >0.05). Secondary analysis included 96 patients: 48 patients (50%) with nonsevere knee OA, and 48 patients (50%) with knee replacement. There was no difference in radiographic parameters or PROMs between the groups.
In this study of complex ASD patients, patients with worse spinal deformities were more likely to have concomitant knee OA. Knee OA was shown to be a predictor of knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion angles, but was not associated with worse PROMs in this study population. Patients with knee arthroplasty, however, had comparable spinal alignment and PROMs relative to those with mild OA.
对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析。
本研究评估膝骨关节炎(OA)和膝关节置换术对接受成人脊柱畸形(ASD)矫正手术患者的对线情况及患者报告结局指标(PROMS)的影响。
ASD患者中膝OA与脊柱对线之间的关系尚未完全明确。膝置换合并ASD的患者与有天然膝关节的ASD患者相比情况如何也尚不清楚。
使用基线全身X线片,由两名独立的评估者根据KL分级对髋和膝OA进行分级。比较不同膝OA组之间的脊柱骨盆参数和PROMS,并比较膝关节置换患者与有天然膝关节患者之间的情况。
199例双侧非重度OA患者(G1组),31例单侧重度膝OA患者(G2组),60例双侧重度膝OA患者(G3组)。重度膝OA患者的脊柱骨盆参数更差。然而,在控制年龄、虚弱程度、骨盆入射角(PI)、胸椎矢状面倾斜角(T1PA)进行多变量回归分析后,膝OA是膝关节屈曲(G1组:-0.02±7.3,G2组:7.8±9.4,G3组:4.5±8.7,P <0.001)和踝关节背屈(G1组:2.3±4.0,G2组:6.6±4.5,G3组:5.1±4.1,P <0.001)的独立预测因素。患者报告结局指标方面无差异(P>0.05)。二次分析纳入96例患者:48例(50%)非重度膝OA患者和48例(50%)膝关节置换患者。两组之间的影像学参数或患者报告结局指标无差异。
在这项针对复杂ASD患者的研究中,脊柱畸形更严重的患者更有可能合并膝OA。在本研究人群中,膝OA被证明是膝关节屈曲和踝关节背屈角度的预测因素,但与更差的患者报告结局指标无关。然而,膝关节置换患者与轻度OA患者相比,脊柱对线情况和患者报告结局指标相当。