Ribeiro Carvalho Catarina, Bernardo Marta Catarina, Martins Moreira Isabel, Mateus Pedro, Baptista Ana, Moreira Ilídio
Department of Cardiology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.
Coron Artery Dis. 2025 Mar 1;36(2):166-172. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001457. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
Current guidelines recommend an early invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 24 h of admission for high-risk patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Nevertheless, meta-analyses failed to demonstrate a clear advantage of this strategy in reducing hard endpoints such as death or nonfatal myocardial infarction compared to a delayed approach. Thus, the optimal timing of ICA in high-risk NSTE-ACS remains undetermined.
This study aimed to determine the optimal timing for ICA in high-risk NSTE-ACS, regarding 1-year all-cause mortality and cardiovascular rehospitalizations.
We conducted a national multicenter retrospective study of high-risk NSTE-ACS patients included in the Portuguese Registry for Acute Coronary Syndromes. Patients were divided into three groups according to the time of ICA: within the first 24 h, between 24 and 48 h, and between 48 and 72 h. The incidence of in-hospital complications and mortality, 1-year mortality, and cardiovascular rehospitalizations were assessed.
Of the 9949 patients included, 46.7% underwent early ICA. This was associated with a lower incidence of acute heart failure (8.5% vs. 11.1% vs. 11.5%, P < 0.001) and shorter length of stay (3 vs. 4 vs. 6 days, P = 0.012). It, however, did not reduce in-hospital complications or mortality (1.2 vs. 0.7 vs. 0.8%, P = 0.066). We also found no significant association with the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality or cardiovascular rehospitalization (15.1 vs. 15.9 vs. 15.7%, P = 0.887).
Early ICA was associated with a lower incidence of acute heart failure and shorter length of stay, without a significant impact on 1-year mortality risk or cardiovascular rehospitalizations.
当前指南建议,对于非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)的高危患者,应在入院24小时内尽早进行有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)。然而,荟萃分析未能证明与延迟治疗相比,该策略在降低死亡或非致命性心肌梗死等硬终点事件方面具有明显优势。因此,高危NSTE-ACS患者ICA的最佳时机仍未确定。
本研究旨在确定高危NSTE-ACS患者ICA的最佳时机,以1年全因死亡率和心血管再住院率为观察指标。
我们对纳入葡萄牙急性冠状动脉综合征注册研究的高危NSTE-ACS患者进行了一项全国多中心回顾性研究。根据ICA时间将患者分为三组:在最初24小时内、在24至48小时之间以及在48至72小时之间。评估住院并发症和死亡率、1年死亡率以及心血管再住院率。
在纳入的9949例患者中,46.7%接受了早期ICA。这与急性心力衰竭发生率较低(8.5%对11.1%对11.5%,P<0.001)和住院时间较短(3天对4天对6天,P=0.012)相关。然而,它并未降低住院并发症或死亡率(1.2%对0.7%对0.8%,P=0.066)。我们还发现,与1年死亡率或心血管再住院的复合终点无显著关联(15.1%对15.9%对15.7%,P=0.887)。
早期ICA与急性心力衰竭发生率较低和住院时间较短相关,对1年死亡风险或心血管再住院无显著影响。