• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何处理和避免单髁膝关节置换术后的翻修?

How to manage and avoid revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?

作者信息

Hao Na, Yu Ke-Xiao, Ran Jin-Wei

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Chongqing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing 400021, China.

出版信息

World J Clin Cases. 2024 Nov 6;12(31):6428-6430. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i31.6428.

DOI:10.12998/wjcc.v12.i31.6428
PMID:39507112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11438694/
Abstract

The article by Zhao presents a retrospective case series on the reasons for initial revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Clarifying the reasons that may cause UKA revision can further reduce the rate of revision UKA, focusing on gasket dislocation, osteophytes, intra-articular loose bodies, and tibial prosthesis loosening. This article provides valuable insights, not only by detailing the revision status of 13 patients who underwent revision after initial UKA but also by providing a comprehensive analysis of the incidence of revision after initial UKA. By reviewing and analyzing the causes, they established references for the early detection of risk factors for revision in clinical practice and for formulating surgical strategies and rehabilitation programmes. This commentary emphasizes the need for a meticulous understanding and an analysis of the revision rate following initial UKA and related management strategies. The implant rates, regional variation, and benefits of uncemented Oxford UKA have been explored, particularly in terms of bone preservation, appropriate surgical techniques, and weight management to control complications and improve patient prognosis.

摘要

赵的这篇文章呈现了一个关于单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)后初次翻修原因的回顾性病例系列。明确可能导致UKA翻修的原因可以进一步降低UKA翻修率,重点关注垫片脱位、骨赘、关节内游离体和胫骨假体松动。本文不仅通过详细阐述13例初次UKA术后接受翻修患者的翻修情况,还通过对初次UKA术后翻修发生率进行全面分析,提供了有价值的见解。通过回顾和分析这些原因,他们为临床实践中早期发现翻修危险因素以及制定手术策略和康复方案建立了参考依据。这篇评论强调了细致了解和分析初次UKA术后翻修率及相关管理策略的必要性。已探讨了非骨水泥型牛津UKA的植入率、地区差异和益处,特别是在骨保留、适当的手术技术以及体重管理以控制并发症和改善患者预后方面。

相似文献

1
How to manage and avoid revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?如何处理和避免单髁膝关节置换术后的翻修?
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Nov 6;12(31):6428-6430. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i31.6428.
2
Analysis of the causes of primary revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A case series.单髁膝关节置换术后初次翻修原因分析:病例系列研究
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Mar 26;12(9):1560-1568. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i9.1560.
3
Disease progression, aseptic loosening and bearing dislocations are the main revision indications after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.疾病进展、无菌性松动和假体脱位是外侧单髁膝关节置换术后的主要翻修指征:一项系统评价。
J ISAKOS. 2022 Oct;7(5):132-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
4
What Are the All-Cause Survivorship Rates and Functional Outcomes in Patients Younger Than 55 Years Undergoing Primary Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.55 岁以下初次膝关节置换患者的全因生存率和功能结局如何?一项系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Mar 1;480(3):507-522. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002023.
5
Cementless, Cruciate-Retaining Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Conventional Instrumentation: Technical Pearls and Intraoperative Considerations.使用传统器械的非骨水泥型、保留交叉韧带初次全膝关节置换术:技术要点与术中注意事项
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 Sep 13;14(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00036. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
6
Analysis of causes for revision in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.单髁膝关节置换术翻修原因分析
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Sep 6;12(25):5642-5645. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i25.5642.
7
Did a New Design of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Prosthesis Result in Improved Survival? A Study From the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 2012-2021.牛津单髁膝关节假体的新设计是否提高了生存率?一项来自挪威关节置换登记处 2012-2021 年的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Sep 1;481(9):1703-1712. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002671. Epub 2023 May 30.
8
Lower early revision rates after uncemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) than cemented Oxford UKA: A meta-analysis.非骨水泥固定 Oxford 单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)比骨水泥固定 Oxford UKA 早期返修率更低:一项荟萃分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 May;107(3):102802. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102802. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
9
Bearing thickness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a reliable predictor of tibial bone loss during revision to total knee arthroplasty.单髁膝关节置换术中的衬垫厚度是翻修为全膝关节置换术中胫骨骨丢失的可靠预测指标。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 May;106(3):429-434. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.12.018. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
10
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Short to Mid-Term Survivorship, and the Effect of Patient and Implant Characteristics: An Analysis of Data From the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.外侧单髁膝关节置换术短至中期生存率的综合评估,以及患者和植入物特征的影响:荷兰关节置换登记处数据分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jul;35(7):1813-1818. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.027. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of the causes of primary revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A case series.单髁膝关节置换术后初次翻修原因分析:病例系列研究
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Mar 26;12(9):1560-1568. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i9.1560.
2
Champions in usage of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty : The story behind the Danish success.在使用单髁膝关节置换术中的佼佼者:丹麦成功背后的故事。
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024 Apr;53(4):246-254. doi: 10.1007/s00132-024-04477-8. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
3
Hospital variation in revision rates after primary knee arthroplasty was not explained by patient selection: baseline data from 1452 patients in the Danish prospective multicenter cohort study, SPARK.丹麦前瞻性多中心队列研究 SPARK 的 1452 名患者的基线数据显示,初次膝关节置换术后翻修率的医院差异不能用患者选择来解释。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Aug;31(8):3474-3486. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07374-3. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
4
Disease progression, aseptic loosening and bearing dislocations are the main revision indications after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.疾病进展、无菌性松动和假体脱位是外侧单髁膝关节置换术后的主要翻修指征:一项系统评价。
J ISAKOS. 2022 Oct;7(5):132-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
5
Clinical Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty after High Tibial Osteotomy and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.翻修全膝关节置换术治疗高位胫骨截骨术和单髁膝关节置换术后的临床疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Aug;14(8):1549-1557. doi: 10.1111/os.13311. Epub 2022 May 25.
6
Lower early revision rates after uncemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) than cemented Oxford UKA: A meta-analysis.非骨水泥固定 Oxford 单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)比骨水泥固定 Oxford UKA 早期返修率更低:一项荟萃分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 May;107(3):102802. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102802. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
7
Is obesity associated with short-term revision after total knee arthroplasty? An analysis of 121,819 primary procedures from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.肥胖与全膝关节置换术后短期翻修有关吗?荷兰关节置换登记处对 121819 例初次手术的分析。
Knee. 2020 Dec;27(6):1899-1906. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.09.020. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
8
Revision Risk for Total Knee Arthroplasty Converted from Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison with Primary and Revision Arthroplasties, Based on Mid-Term Results from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry.从内侧单髁膝关节置换术转为全膝关节置换术的翻修风险:基于丹麦膝关节置换登记处的中期结果与初次和翻修置换术的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Nov 20;101(22):1999-2006. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01468.
9
Weight and height separated provide better understanding than BMI on the risk of revision after total knee arthroplasty: report of 107,228 primary total knee arthroplasties from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 2009-2017.体重和身高分开提供了比 BMI 更好的理解,有助于预测全膝关节置换术后的翻修风险:2009-2017 年瑞典膝关节置换登记处 107228 例初次全膝关节置换术的报告。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Feb;91(1):94-97. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1688006. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
10
Comparison of the outcomes of navigation-assisted revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty versus navigation-assisted primary TKA.导航辅助下单间室膝关节置换翻修与初次全膝关节置换术的疗效比较。
Int Orthop. 2019 Feb;43(2):315-322. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4028-2. Epub 2018 Jun 19.