• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线录制的康复叙事对改善有精神病体验者生活质量的有效性和成本效益(NEON试验):一项实用随机对照试验

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of online recorded recovery narratives in improving quality of life for people with psychosis experience (NEON Trial): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Slade Mike, Rennick-Egglestone Stefan, Robinson Clare, Newby Chris, Elliott Rachel A, Ali Yasmin, Yeo Caroline, Glover Tony, Gavan Sean P, Paterson Luke, Pollock Kristian, Priebe Stefan, Thornicroft Graham, Keppens Jeroen, Smuk Melanie, Franklin Donna, Walcott Rianna, Harrison Julian, Robotham Dan, Bradstreet Simon, Gillard Steve, Cuijpers Pim, Farkas Marianne, Ben-Zeev Dror, Repper Julie, Kotera Yasuhiro, Roe James, Llewellyn-Beardsley Joy, Ng Fiona

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Health and Community Participation Division, Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Namsos, Norway.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Oct 23;47:101101. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101101. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101101
PMID:39507771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11539663/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) Intervention provides self-managed web-based access to mental health recovery narratives (n = 659). We evaluated effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in improving quality of life for adults resident in England with mental health problems and recent psychosis experience.

METHODS

Prospectively registered pragmatic parallel-group randomised trial controlling for usual care, recruiting from statutory mental health services and through community engagement activities, with a 52-week primary endpoint (ISRCTN11152837). All trial procedures and the NEON Intervention were delivered by an integrated web-application. Randomisation was through an independently generated list (no stratification). Allocation was masked for statistical staff and the Chief Investigator but not participants. Intervention arm participants received immediate NEON Intervention access. Control arm participants received access after completing primary endpoint questionnaires. The primary outcome was quality of life through the Manchester Short Assessment (MANSA). Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) were collected through web-based safety report forms and identified from health service usage data. The primary analysis was by a prospectively described Intention To Treat principle excluding participants who had registered multiple times, with multiple imputation for missing data.

FINDINGS

Between 9 March 2020 and 1 March 2021, 739 participants were randomised (intervention:370; control: 369), providing more than 90% power to detect a baseline-adjusted difference of 0.25 in the MANSA score. Mean age was 34.8 years (standard deviation (SD) 12.0), 561 (75.9%) were white British, 443 (59.9%) were female, 609 (82.4%) had accessed specialist care mental health services, and 698 (94.5%) had accessed primary care mental health services. Mean baseline MANSA score was 3.7 for control and intervention arms (SD 0.9 and 1.0). 565 (76.5%) participants provided primary endpoint MANSA data with a mean score of 4.1 (SD 1.0) for both arms. We found no significant difference in Quality of Life between the two arms at the primary endpoint (baseline-adjusted difference 0.07, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.21, p = 0.35). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (£110,501 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY)) exceeded the prospectively defined cost-effectiveness threshold (£30,000 per QALY). 158 (42.8%) control arm and 194 (52.4%) intervention arm participants accessed narratives outside of the NEON Intervention. There were no related serious adverse events (SAEs). 116 unrelated SAEs were reported by control arm participants, and 107 by intervention arm participants.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings do not indicate NEON Intervention access for all people with psychosis experience. Future research should consider a) evaluation with current mental health services users; b) optimisation to enable users to find hope-promoting narratives.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR).

摘要

背景

在线叙事体验(NEON)干预提供基于网络的自我管理方式,可获取心理健康康复叙事(共659篇)。我们评估了该干预措施对英格兰患有心理健康问题且近期有精神病体验的成年人改善生活质量的有效性和成本效益。

方法

一项前瞻性注册的实用平行组随机对照试验,对照常规护理,从法定心理健康服务机构以及通过社区参与活动招募参与者,主要终点为52周(国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN11152837)。所有试验程序和NEON干预均通过一个集成网络应用程序提供。随机化通过独立生成的列表进行(无分层)。统计人员和首席研究员对分配情况保密,但参与者知晓。干预组参与者可立即访问NEON干预。对照组参与者在完成主要终点问卷后可获得访问权限。主要结局是通过曼彻斯特简短评估(MANSA)得出的生活质量。严重不良事件(SAE)通过基于网络的安全报告表收集,并从卫生服务使用数据中识别。主要分析采用前瞻性描述的意向性分析原则,排除多次注册的参与者,并对缺失数据进行多重插补。

结果

在2020年3月9日至2021年3月1日期间,739名参与者被随机分组(干预组:370名;对照组:369名),有超过90%的把握度检测到MANSA评分中经基线调整后的差异为0.25。平均年龄为34.8岁(标准差(SD)12.0),561名(75.9%)为英国白人,443名(59.9%)为女性,609名(82.4%)曾使用过专科心理健康服务,698名(94.5%)曾使用过初级保健心理健康服务。对照组和干预组的平均基线MANSA评分为3.7(标准差分别为0.9和1.0)。565名(76.5%)参与者提供了主要终点MANSA数据,并得出两组的平均评分为4.1(标准差1.0)。我们发现在主要终点时两组之间的生活质量无显著差异(经基线调整后的差异为0.07,95%置信区间为-0.07至0.21,p = 0.35)。增量成本效益比(每质量调整生命年(QALY)110,501英镑)超过了前瞻性定义的成本效益阈值(每QALY 30,000英镑)。158名(42.8%)对照组和194名(52.4%)干预组参与者在NEON干预之外访问了叙事内容。未出现相关严重不良事件(SAE)。对照组参与者报告了116起无关SAE,干预组参与者报告了107起。

解读

我们的研究结果并未表明所有有精神病体验的人都可使用NEON干预。未来研究应考虑:a)对当前心理健康服务使用者进行评估;b)进行优化,以便使用者能够找到促进希望的叙事内容。

资金来源

国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb02/11539663/892d914aa749/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb02/11539663/892d914aa749/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb02/11539663/892d914aa749/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of online recorded recovery narratives in improving quality of life for people with psychosis experience (NEON Trial): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.在线录制的康复叙事对改善有精神病体验者生活质量的有效性和成本效益(NEON试验):一项实用随机对照试验
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Oct 23;47:101101. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101101. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Impact of receiving recorded mental health recovery narratives on quality of life in people experiencing psychosis, people experiencing other mental health problems and for informal carers: Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) study protocol for three randomised controlled trials.接受心理健康康复叙事记录对经历精神病、其他心理健康问题的人和非正式照顾者的生活质量的影响:叙事体验在线(NEON)研究方案,用于三项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2020 Jul 20;21(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04428-6.
3
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of online recorded recovery narratives in improving quality of life for people with non-psychotic mental health problems: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.在线录制的康复叙事对改善非精神病性心理健康问题患者生活质量的有效性和成本效益:一项实用随机对照试验。
World Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;23(1):101-112. doi: 10.1002/wps.21176.
4
Statistical analysis plans for two randomised controlled trials of the Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) Intervention: impact of receiving recorded mental health recovery narratives on quality of life in people experiencing psychosis (NEON) and people experiencing non-psychosis mental health problems (NEON-O).两项叙事体验在线(NEON)干预随机对照试验的统计分析计划:接受心理健康康复叙事记录对经历精神病和非精神病心理健康问题者生活质量的影响(NEON)和经历非精神病心理健康问题者(NEON-O)。
Trials. 2023 May 20;24(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07246-8.
5
Impact of receiving recorded mental health recovery narratives on quality of life in people experiencing non-psychosis mental health problems (NEON-O Trial): updated randomised controlled trial protocol.体验非精神病性心理健康问题的人群中接受心理健康康复叙事录音对生活质量的影响(NEON-O 试验):更新的随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2022 Jan 29;23(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06027-z.
6
Nurse-delivered sleep restriction therapy to improve insomnia disorder in primary care: the HABIT RCT.护士主导的睡眠限制疗法改善初级保健中的失眠障碍:HABIT RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(36):1-107. doi: 10.3310/RJYT4275.
7
Perception and appropriation of a web-based recovery narratives intervention: qualitative interview study.基于网络的康复叙事干预的认知与应用:定性访谈研究
Front Digit Health. 2024 Feb 14;6:1297935. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1297935. eCollection 2024.
8
Exercise to prevent shoulder problems after breast cancer surgery: the PROSPER RCT.乳腺癌手术后预防肩部问题的运动:PROSPER RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Feb;26(15):1-124. doi: 10.3310/JKNZ2003.
9
Online remote behavioural intervention for tics in 9- to 17-year-olds: the ORBIT RCT with embedded process and economic evaluation.9 至 17 岁青少年抽动在线远程行为干预:嵌入过程和经济评价的 ORBIT RCT
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Oct;27(18):1-120. doi: 10.3310/CPMS3211.
10
Differences Between Online Trial Participants Who Have Used Statutory Mental Health Services and Those Who Have Not: Analysis of Baseline Data From 2 Pragmatic Trials of a Digital Health Intervention.使用法定精神卫生服务的在线试验参与者与未使用的参与者之间的差异:数字健康干预的 2 项实用试验的基线数据分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 27;25:e44687. doi: 10.2196/44687.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychoeducational Intervention for Caregivers of Adolescents and Young Adults with Psychiatric Disorders: A 7-Year Systematic Review.针对患有精神疾病的青少年和青年照顾者的心理教育干预:一项7年的系统综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 21;13(23):7010. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237010.

本文引用的文献

1
Data Integrity Issues With Web-Based Studies: An Institutional Example of a Widespread Challenge.基于网络研究中的数据完整性问题:一个广泛存在挑战的机构实例
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Sep 16;11:e58432. doi: 10.2196/58432.
2
The Implementation of Recommender Systems for Mental Health Recovery Narratives: Evaluation of Use and Performance.心理健康康复叙事推荐系统的实现:使用和性能评估。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Mar 29;11:e45754. doi: 10.2196/45754.
3
Perception and appropriation of a web-based recovery narratives intervention: qualitative interview study.
基于网络的康复叙事干预的认知与应用:定性访谈研究
Front Digit Health. 2024 Feb 14;6:1297935. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1297935. eCollection 2024.
4
The effectiveness, implementation, and experiences of peer support approaches for mental health: a systematic umbrella review.同伴支持方法在心理健康方面的效果、实施和经验:系统的伞式综述。
BMC Med. 2024 Feb 29;22(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03260-y.
5
Pragmatic, feasibility randomized controlled trial of a recorded mental health recovery narrative intervention: narrative experiences online intervention for informal carers (NEON-C).一项关于心理健康康复叙事记录干预措施的实用、可行性随机对照试验:照顾者在线叙事体验干预(NEON-C)
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 23;14:1272396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1272396. eCollection 2023.
6
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of online recorded recovery narratives in improving quality of life for people with non-psychotic mental health problems: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.在线录制的康复叙事对改善非精神病性心理健康问题患者生活质量的有效性和成本效益:一项实用随机对照试验。
World Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;23(1):101-112. doi: 10.1002/wps.21176.
7
Organisational and student characteristics, fidelity, funding models, and unit costs of recovery colleges in 28 countries: a cross-sectional survey.28 个国家/地区康复学院的组织和学生特征、忠实度、资金模式和单位成本:横断面调查。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2023 Oct;10(10):768-779. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00229-8. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
8
Does knowledge of liver fibrosis affect high-risk drinking behaviour (KLIFAD): an open-label pragmatic feasibility randomised controlled trial.肝纤维化知识是否会影响高危饮酒行为(KLIFAD):一项开放标签实用可行性随机对照试验
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jun 30;61:102069. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102069. eCollection 2023 Jul.
9
Differences Between Online Trial Participants Who Have Used Statutory Mental Health Services and Those Who Have Not: Analysis of Baseline Data From 2 Pragmatic Trials of a Digital Health Intervention.使用法定精神卫生服务的在线试验参与者与未使用的参与者之间的差异:数字健康干预的 2 项实用试验的基线数据分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 27;25:e44687. doi: 10.2196/44687.
10
Statistical analysis plans for two randomised controlled trials of the Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) Intervention: impact of receiving recorded mental health recovery narratives on quality of life in people experiencing psychosis (NEON) and people experiencing non-psychosis mental health problems (NEON-O).两项叙事体验在线(NEON)干预随机对照试验的统计分析计划:接受心理健康康复叙事记录对经历精神病和非精神病心理健康问题者生活质量的影响(NEON)和经历非精神病心理健康问题者(NEON-O)。
Trials. 2023 May 20;24(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07246-8.