Unal Pauline, Samargandi Ramy, Saad Maxime, Turbillon Céline, Schmitt Antoine, Berhouet Julien
Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologie, CHRU Trousseau, Faculté de Médecine de Tours, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
J Orthop. 2024 Oct 10;62:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.10.015. eCollection 2025 Apr.
The method of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using the tibia-dependent femoral tunnel technique is highly criticized. It would not allow anatomical placement of the graft and would therefore lead to a high rate of retear. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the rate of retear in ACL reconstructions using the transtibial tunnel (TT) technique and assess functional outcomes. The study included 148 patients (153 knees) who underwent ACL reconstruction with a minimum two-year follow-up period. Patients underwent clinical examinations, completed functional questionnaires (KOOS, Lysholm, ACL-RSI), and underwent laximetry measurements with GNRB at 134 N and 200 N. Two patients had retears detected on MRI and underwent revision surgery prior to the study, leaving 151 knees for evaluation. The retear rate was 6.6 %, with an overall rate of 7.8 % when including revision cases. Laxity measurements obtained with GNRB showed a strong correlation with functional scores, indicating worse scores with greater laxity differences (p < 0.0001). The retear rate observed in this study was at the higher end of those reported in the literature. The study indications for TT ACL reconstructions must be defined more specifically to reduce failure rates. Level of evidence: III (retrospective cohort study).
使用依赖胫骨的股骨隧道技术重建前交叉韧带(ACL)的方法受到了严厉批评。它无法实现移植物的解剖学放置,因此会导致较高的再撕裂率。这项回顾性研究旨在评估使用经胫骨隧道(TT)技术进行ACL重建时的再撕裂率,并评估功能结果。该研究纳入了148例患者(153个膝关节),这些患者接受了ACL重建,且随访期至少为两年。患者接受了临床检查,完成了功能问卷(KOOS、Lysholm、ACL-RSI),并在134 N和200 N的力下使用GNRB进行了松弛度测量。两名患者在MRI检查中发现有再撕裂,并在研究前接受了翻修手术,剩余151个膝关节用于评估。再撕裂率为6.6%,包括翻修病例时的总体再撕裂率为7.8%。使用GNRB获得的松弛度测量结果与功能评分显示出强烈的相关性,表明松弛度差异越大,评分越差(p < 0.0001)。本研究中观察到的再撕裂率处于文献报道的较高水平。必须更明确地界定TT ACL重建的研究适应症,以降低失败率。证据水平:III(回顾性队列研究)。