Mendonça C, Marques D, Silveira J, Marques J, de Souza R F, Mata A
Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Biology and Oral Biochemistry Group, LIBPhys-FCT UIDB/04559/2020, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2025 Jul;10(3):246-268. doi: 10.1177/23800844241240474. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
The effectiveness of nonsurgical periodontal treatment is related to patient- and tooth-related factors. To overcome the limitations of the conventional approach, probiotics are one of the adjunct therapies that have been studied.
This umbrella review answered the focused question: in adult patients with periodontal diseases or peri-implant diseases, does the use of probiotic therapy as an adjuvant to nonsurgical periodontal treatment when compared with nonsurgical periodontal treatment alone affect treatment effectiveness and clinical disease parameters?
A systematic electronic search to identify systematic reviews according to PICOS criteria, defined a priori, was used, and 5 electronic databases were searched (Medline, LILACS, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and DANS EASY). Included systematic reviews were rated using quality assessment tools by 2 independent reviewers.
Thirty systematic reviews were identified evaluating the effectiveness of probiotics in periodontal and peri-implant disease treatment. A quantitative analysis of the results was not possible due to the high heterogeneity of clinical data. Seventeen of 31 reviews reported clinically relevant benefits of probiotic therapy as an adjuvant to scaling and root planning. Twenty-two reviews had a low risk of bias, 7 had a moderate risk, and 2 had a high risk.
The evidence from the available studies is conflicting, which means that no definitive conclusions can be made about the effectiveness of probiotic therapy as an adjuvant to nonsurgical periodontal treatment. High-quality primary research studies are needed that control for known confounding variables.Knowledge Transfer Statement:This umbrella review provides some evidence regarding the efficacy of probiotics as an adjunct to nonsurgical periodontal therapy, despite some equivocal findings. However, short-term probiotic use alongside therapy appears to be advantageous; there is currently no evidence supporting their long-term benefits. We have also identified that probiotic research is primarily constrained by its origins in gastrointestinal applications, resulting in a lack of approved probiotics for dental use. This review highlights the need for extensive clinical research to ascertain their effectiveness in the oral environment. Nevertheless, the utilization of probiotics alongside periodontal treatment seems safe, with no reported adverse effects in patients. Thus, further clinical validations in oral health care settings are crucial.
非手术牙周治疗的有效性与患者及牙齿相关因素有关。为克服传统方法的局限性,益生菌是已被研究的辅助治疗方法之一。
本综合性综述回答了以下重点问题:在患有牙周病或种植体周围疾病的成年患者中,与单纯非手术牙周治疗相比,使用益生菌疗法作为非手术牙周治疗的辅助手段是否会影响治疗效果和临床疾病参数?
采用系统的电子检索方法,根据预先定义的PICOS标准识别系统评价,并检索了5个电子数据库(Medline、LILACS、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、谷歌学术和DANS EASY)。纳入的系统评价由2名独立评审员使用质量评估工具进行评分。
共确定了30项评估益生菌在牙周病和种植体周围疾病治疗中有效性的系统评价。由于临床数据的高度异质性,无法对结果进行定量分析。31项评价中有17项报告了益生菌疗法作为龈下刮治和根面平整辅助手段的临床相关益处。22项评价的偏倚风险较低,7项为中度风险,2项为高度风险。
现有研究的证据相互矛盾,这意味着关于益生菌疗法作为非手术牙周治疗辅助手段的有效性无法得出明确结论。需要开展高质量的原始研究,控制已知的混杂变量。
本综合性综述提供了一些关于益生菌作为非手术牙周治疗辅助手段疗效的证据,尽管有些结果不明确。然而,在治疗期间短期使用益生菌似乎是有益的;目前没有证据支持其长期益处。我们还发现,益生菌研究主要受其在胃肠道应用的起源限制,导致缺乏经批准用于牙科的益生菌。本综述强调需要进行广泛的临床研究,以确定其在口腔环境中的有效性。尽管如此,在牙周治疗中使用益生菌似乎是安全的,患者中未报告有不良反应。因此,在口腔保健环境中进行进一步的临床验证至关重要。