Centre for Biologics Evaluation, Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate, HPFB, Health Canada and WHO Collaborating Center for Standardization and Evaluation of Biologicals, Ottawa, Canada.
Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2024 Dec;13(1):2427792. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2427792. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
The nucleoprotein (NP) of type A influenza virus (IAV) is highly conserved across all virus strains, making it an attractive candidate antigen for universal vaccines. While various studies have explored NP-induced mucosal immunity, here we interrogated the mechanistic differences between intramuscular (IM) and intranasal (IN) delivery of a recombinant adenovirus carrying NP fused with a bifunctional CD40 ligand. Despite being less effective than IM delivery in inducing systemic cellular immune responses and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), IN immunization elicited superior antigen-specific recall humoral and cellular response in the nasal associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) of the upper respiratory tract, the initial site of immune recognition and elimination of inhaled pathogens. IN vaccination also induced significantly stronger pulmonary T cell responses in the lower respiratory tract than IM vaccination, in particular the CD8 T cells. Moreover, blocking lymphocyte circulation abrogated IM but not IN immunization induced protection, illustrating the critical role of local memory immune response upon viral infection. Notably, the CD40-targeted nasal delivery not only improved the magnitude but also the breadth of protection, including against lethal challenge with a newly isolated highly pathogenic avian H5N1 strain. These findings are informative for the design of universal mucosal vaccines, where the predominant mode of protection is independent of neutralizing antibodies.
甲型流感病毒(IAV)的核蛋白(NP)在所有病毒株中高度保守,使其成为通用疫苗的有吸引力的候选抗原。虽然已有各种研究探索了 NP 诱导的黏膜免疫,但在这里,我们研究了携带与双功能 CD40 配体融合的 NP 的重组腺病毒肌内(IM)和鼻内(IN)给药的机制差异。尽管 IN 免疫在诱导全身细胞免疫反应和抗体依赖性细胞细胞毒性(ADCC)方面不如 IM 给药有效,但 IN 免疫在呼吸道上呼吸道的鼻相关淋巴组织(NALT)中引起了更好的抗原特异性回忆体液和细胞反应,这是免疫识别和吸入性病原体消除的初始部位。IN 疫苗接种还诱导了比 IM 疫苗接种更强的下呼吸道肺部 T 细胞反应,特别是 CD8 T 细胞。此外,阻断淋巴细胞循环消除了 IM 但不是 IN 免疫诱导的保护,这表明在病毒感染时局部记忆免疫反应起着关键作用。值得注意的是,针对 CD40 的鼻内递送不仅提高了保护的程度,而且还提高了保护的广度,包括对新分离的高致病性禽流感 H5N1 株的致命挑战。这些发现为通用黏膜疫苗的设计提供了信息,其中主要的保护模式独立于中和抗体。