Huang Hsiang-Han, Lee Yung-Tze, Lai Chen-Ling, Lin Min-Ching
Department of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Joint Appointment with Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Assist Technol. 2025 Mar 4;37(2):111-119. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2024.2423606. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
This study conducted a secondary analysis to objectively measure the effects of modified ride-on cars (MROCs) training in different postures on physical activity (PA) levels in children with motor delays. Data from 39 participants were analyzed in a randomized controlled trial. The participants included those using MROC in standing postures ( = 11, mean age = 22.87 months), MROC in sitting postures ( = 16, mean age = 19.53 months), and a control group that received conventional therapy ( = 12, mean age = 23.30 months). PA intensity was measured using an ActiGraph GT3X on the participants' wrists and right hip at weeks 1, 6, and 12 of the 12-week intervention period. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02527356). The demographic data were similar across the groups. No significant differences were found in the interaction, group, or time effects for any of the positions ( > 0.05). The PA levels were consistent in at least light PA intensity range. MROC training may yield PA levels comparable to those of conventional therapy. Variations in activity and motor impairment severity could affect outcomes. Future studies should investigate factors such as task characteristics, motor delay severity, PA cutoff points, and training dosage that may influence PA intensity.
本研究进行了二次分析,以客观测量改良乘骑汽车(MROC)不同姿势训练对运动发育迟缓儿童身体活动(PA)水平的影响。在一项随机对照试验中分析了39名参与者的数据。参与者包括站立姿势使用MROC的儿童(n = 11,平均年龄 = 22.87个月)、坐姿使用MROC的儿童(n = 16,平均年龄 = 19.53个月),以及接受传统疗法的对照组(n = 12,平均年龄 = 23.30个月)。在为期12周的干预期的第1、6和12周,使用ActiGraph GT3X在参与者的手腕和右髋部测量PA强度。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02527356)注册。各组的人口统计学数据相似。在任何姿势的交互作用、组间或时间效应方面均未发现显著差异(P>0.05)。PA水平在至少轻度PA强度范围内是一致的。MROC训练可能产生与传统疗法相当的PA水平。活动和运动障碍严重程度的差异可能会影响结果。未来的研究应调查可能影响PA强度的因素,如任务特征、运动发育迟缓严重程度、PA截止点和训练剂量。