• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋部结构与骨折事件:来自 20 年 Geelong 骨质疏松研究数据的时间更新生存分析。

Hip structure and incident fracture: a time-updating survival analysis over 20 years of data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

机构信息

IMPACT (Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation), Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Biostatistics Unit, Geelong, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Osteoporos. 2024 Nov 7;19(1):110. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01471-7.

DOI:10.1007/s11657-024-01471-7
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Hip structural analysis parameters are associated with risk of fracture in women across a long follow-up period, with buckling ratio persisting independent of total hip BMD.

PURPOSE

Hip structural analysis (HSA) uses dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) hip scans to calculate geometries of narrow neck (NN), intertrochanter (IT), and shaft (S), which may complement bone mineral density (BMD) for assessing fracture risk. We aimed to determine whether HSA parameters were associated with fracture.

METHODS

Participants were women (n = 986, ages 40-94 year) from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. HSA was calculated from Lunar DPX-L scans. Low-trauma incident fractures were identified radiologically. Participants were followed from baseline to first fracture, death, or end of follow-up period (31/12/16) (13,487 person-years follow-up). Time-updating Cox-proportional hazards modelling investigated associations between HSA parameters and fracture.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-five participants reported fractures (rate: 24.99/1000 person-years [95% CI 22.46-27.80]). Higher NN BMD (HR:0.12, 95% CI:0.05-0.29), cross-sectional area (CSA) (0.37, 0.26-0.52), cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI) (0.66, 0.50-0.89), section modulus (SM) (0.40, 0.24-0.68) and cortical thickness (CT) (0.00, 0.00-0.01 due to rounding) were associated with decreased risk. IT BMD (0.08, 0.04-0.20), CSA (0.58, 0.49-0.69), CSMI (0.90, 0.85-0.94), and SM (0.69, 0.59-0.81) were similarly associated. Decreased risk was observed at increased values of S BMD (0.20, 0.10-0.38), CSA (0.60, 0.47-0.76), SM (0.60, 0.43-0.83), and CT (0.03, 0.01-0.14). Higher S endocortical diameter (1.81, 1.29-2.53), and buckling ratio (BR) at all sites (NN: 1.07, 1.04-1.11; IT: 1.08, 1.05-1.11, S: 1.31, 1.19-1.46) were associated with increased risk. After adjustment for total hip BMD, the associations with BR at the shaft (1.14, 1.00-1.30) were sustained. Other associations were attenuated.

CONCLUSION

A greater shaft buckling ratio was associated with an increased risk for fracture, independent of total hip BMD.

摘要

目的

髋关节结构分析(HSA)使用双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)髋关节扫描来计算窄颈(NN)、转子间(IT)和骨干(S)的几何形状,这可能会补充骨矿物质密度(BMD)来评估骨折风险。我们旨在确定 HSA 参数是否与骨折有关。

方法

参与者为来自 Geelong 骨质疏松症研究的 986 名女性(年龄 40-94 岁)。HSA 是从 Lunar DPX-L 扫描中计算出来的。通过放射学确定低创伤性的骨折。从基线到首次骨折、死亡或随访期结束(31/12/16)(13487 人年随访)对参与者进行随访。时间更新的 Cox 比例风险模型研究了 HSA 参数与骨折之间的关联。

结论

更大的骨干弯曲比与骨折风险增加相关,独立于全髋关节 BMD。

相似文献

1
Hip structure and incident fracture: a time-updating survival analysis over 20 years of data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.髋部结构与骨折事件:来自 20 年 Geelong 骨质疏松研究数据的时间更新生存分析。
Arch Osteoporos. 2024 Nov 7;19(1):110. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01471-7.
2
Prediction of incident hip fracture risk by femur geometry variables measured by hip structural analysis in the study of osteoporotic fractures.在骨质疏松性骨折研究中,通过髋部结构分析测量的股骨几何变量预测髋部骨折发生风险。
J Bone Miner Res. 2008 Dec;23(12):1892-904. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080802.
3
Hip structural geometry and incidence of hip fracture in postmenopausal women: what does it add to conventional bone mineral density?绝经后妇女的髋部结构几何形状和髋部骨折的发生率:它对常规骨密度有何补充?
Osteoporos Int. 2010 Jun;21(6):919-29. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1056-1. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
4
The effects of bazedoxifene on bone structural strength evaluated by hip structure analysis.通过髋部结构分析评估巴多昔芬对骨结构强度的影响。
Bone. 2015 Aug;77:115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.04.027. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
5
Effect of eldecalcitol, an active vitamin D analog, on hip structure and biomechanical properties: 3D assessment by clinical CT.活性维生素 D 类似物艾地骨化醇对髋部结构和生物力学性能的影响:临床 CT 的 3D 评估。
Bone. 2011 Sep;49(3):328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 May 15.
6
Effects of gender, anthropometric variables, and aging on the evolution of hip strength in men and women aged over 65.性别、人体测量学变量及衰老对65岁以上男性和女性髋部力量变化的影响。
Bone. 2003 May;32(5):561-70. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(03)00055-3.
7
Differential effects of teriparatide, denosumab and zoledronate on hip structural and mechanical parameters in osteoporosis; a real-life study.特立帕肽、地舒单抗和唑来膦酸对骨质疏松症髋关节结构和力学参数的影响差异:一项真实世界研究。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2024 Jul;47(7):1667-1677. doi: 10.1007/s40618-023-02280-4. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
8
Does hip structural analysis confer additional benefit to routine BMD assessment in postmenopausal women with hip fracture? A study from a tertiary center in southern India.髋关节结构分析是否能为绝经后髋部骨折女性的常规 BMD 评估提供额外的益处?来自印度南部一家三级中心的研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2022 Feb 5;17(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s11657-022-01070-4.
9
Fracture Risk Indices From DXA-Based Finite Element Analysis Predict Incident Fractures Independently From FRAX: The Manitoba BMD Registry.基于 DXA 的有限元分析的骨折风险指数可独立于 FRAX 预测骨折事件:曼尼托巴 BMD 登记处。
J Clin Densitom. 2019 Jul-Sep;22(3):338-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
10
Age-specific reference values of hip geometric indices from a representative sample of the Japanese female population: Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study.日本女性人群代表性样本的髋关节几何指数的年龄特异性参考值:日本基于人群的骨质疏松症(JPOS)研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Jun;22(6):1987-96. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1406-z. Epub 2010 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Hip Structure Analysis Variables on Hip Fracture: A Propensity Score Matching Study.髋部结构分析变量对髋部骨折的影响:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
J Clin Med. 2019 Sep 20;8(10):1507. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101507.
2
Associations Between Bone Impact Microindentation and Clinical Risk Factors for Fracture.骨冲击微压痕与骨折临床危险因素的相关性。
Endocrinology. 2019 Sep 1;160(9):2143-2150. doi: 10.1210/en.2019-00415.
3
The Cost of Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, and Associated Fractures in Australia in 2017.2017 年澳大利亚骨质疏松症、低骨量和相关骨折的成本。
J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Apr;34(4):616-625. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3640. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
4
Prediction of major osteoporotic and hip fractures in Australian men using FRAX scores adjusted with trabecular bone score.基于骨小梁评分调整的 FRAX 评分对澳大利亚男性主要骨质疏松性骨折和髋部骨折的预测。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Jan;29(1):101-108. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4226-6. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
5
Diagnostic devices for osteoporosis in the general population: A systematic review.普通人群骨质疏松症的诊断设备:一项系统评价。
Bone. 2016 Nov;92:58-69. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
6
The Epidemiology of Incident Fracture from Cradle to Senescence.从摇篮到衰老期新发骨折的流行病学
Calcif Tissue Int. 2015 Dec;97(6):568-76. doi: 10.1007/s00223-015-0053-y. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
7
Changes in quality of life associated with fragility fractures: Australian arm of the International Cost and Utility Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (AusICUROS).与脆性骨折相关的生活质量变化:骨质疏松性骨折国际成本与效用研究(AusICUROS)澳大利亚分部
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Jun;26(6):1781-90. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3088-z. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
8
Fracture risk among older men: osteopenia and osteoporosis defined using cut-points derived from female versus male reference data.老年男性的骨折风险:使用源自女性与男性参考数据的切点定义骨质减少和骨质疏松症。
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Mar;25(3):857-62. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2561-9. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
9
Applications of a New Handheld Reference Point Indentation Instrument Measuring Bone Material Strength.一种新型手持式参考点压痕仪测量骨材料强度的应用。
J Med Device. 2013 Dec;7(4):410051-410056. doi: 10.1115/1.4024829. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
10
The contribution of cortical and trabecular tissues to bone strength: insights from denosumab studies.皮质骨和小梁骨组织对骨强度的贡献:来自地诺单抗研究的见解。
Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2013 Jan;10(1):47-51. doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2013.10.1.047.