Ri Motonari, Nishie Naoki, Ohashi Manabu, Fukuoka Shota, Yamaguchi Kensei, Makuuchi Rie, Hayami Masaru, Irino Tomoyuki, Sano Takeshi, Nunobe Souya
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Gastric Cancer. 2025 Jan;28(1):122-130. doi: 10.1007/s10120-024-01565-8. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
It is essential to ensure optimal adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy regimens following gastric cancer surgery. However, treatment intensity for S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy has not as yet been compared between minimally invasive (MI) and open (Open) surgery.
We retrospectively compared dose modification of adjuvant S-1 between MI and Open surgery in patients undergoing R0 gastrectomy for gastric or esophago-gastric junction cancer at the Cancer Institute Hospital Tokyo, Japan, during the period from 2012 to 2022, and receiving S-1 for pStage II or S-1 plus docetaxel for pStage III as adjuvant chemotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to adjust for possible confounders.
In total, 323 patients were initially included. After PSM, 158 patients remained, 79 in each group. The adjuvant chemotherapy completion rates were similar in the two groups. However, the proportion of patients who required S-1 dose reduction was significantly lower in the MI than in the Open group (43.0% vs. 65.8%, p = 0.004). In addition, the MI group had significantly fewer patients requiring suspension of S-1 than the Open group (46.8% vs. 64.6%, p = 0.025). Moreover, the frequency of adverse events of grade ≥ 3 was significantly lower in the MI than in the Open group (17.7% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.042).
In adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer, minimally invasive surgery may offer better treatment intensity for oral S-1 administration than open surgery.
胃癌手术后确保最佳辅助化疗方案依从性至关重要。然而,作为辅助化疗的S-1治疗强度在微创(MI)手术和开放(Open)手术之间尚未进行比较。
我们回顾性比较了2012年至2022年期间在日本东京癌症研究所医院接受R0胃切除术治疗胃癌或食管胃交界癌、且接受S-1作为II期辅助化疗或S-1联合多西他赛作为III期辅助化疗的患者中,MI手术和Open手术之间辅助S-1的剂量调整情况。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)以调整可能的混杂因素。
最初共纳入323例患者。PSM后,剩余158例患者,每组79例。两组辅助化疗完成率相似。然而,MI组中需要降低S-1剂量的患者比例显著低于Open组(43.0%对65.8%,p = 0.004)。此外,MI组中需要暂停S-1治疗的患者明显少于Open组(46.8%对64.6%,p = 0.025)。而且,MI组中≥3级不良事件的发生率显著低于Open组(17.7%对31.7%,p = 0.042)。
在胃癌辅助化疗中,微创手术相比开放手术可能为口服S-1给药提供更好的治疗强度。