Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Japan.
Biostatistics Center, Kurume University, Kurume, Japan.
JAMA Surg. 2023 May 1;158(5):445-454. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0096.
Evidence of implementation of laparoscopic gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer is currently insufficient, as the primary end point in previous prospective studies was evaluated at a median follow-up time of 3 years. More robust evidence is necessary to verify noninferiority of laparoscopic gastrectomy.
To compare 5-year survival outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a multicenter, open-label, noninferiority, prospective randomized clinical trial. Between November 26, 2009, and July 29, 2016, eligible patients with histologically proven gastric carcinoma from 37 institutes in Japan were enrolled. Two interim analyses and final analysis were performed in October 2014, May 2018, and November 2021, respectively.
Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the ODG or LADG group. The procedures were performed exclusively by qualified surgeons.
The primary end point was 5-year relapse-free survival, and the noninferiority margin for the hazard ratio (HR) was set at 1.31. The secondary end points were 5-year overall survival and safety.
A total of 502 patients were included in the full-analysis set: 254 (50.6%) in the ODG group and 248 (49.4%) in the LADG group. Patients in the ODG group had a median (IQR) age of 67 (33-80) years and included 168 males (66.1%). Patients in the LADG group had a median (IQR) age of 64 (34-80) years and included 169 males (68.1%). No significant differences were observed in severe postoperative complications between the 2 groups in the safety analysis (ODG, 4.7% [11 of 233] vs LADG, 3.5% [8 of 227]; P = .64). The median (IQR) follow-up for all patients after randomization was 67.9 (60.3-92.0) months. The 5-year relapse-free survival was 73.9% (95% CI, 68.7%-79.5%) and 75.7% (95% CI, 70.5%-81.2%) for the ODG and LADG groups, respectively, and the HR was 0.96 (90% CI, 0.72-1.26; noninferiority 1-sided P = .03). Further, no significant difference was observed in overall survival time between the 2 groups, and the HR was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.57-1.21; P = .34). The pattern of recurrence was similar between the 2 groups.
Results of this study show that on the basis of 5-year follow-up data, LADG with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer, when performed by qualified surgeons, was proved noninferior to ODG. This laparoscopic approach could become a standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer.
UMIN Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN000003420.
重要性:目前,腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术治疗局部进展期胃癌的证据仍然不足,因为之前前瞻性研究的主要终点是在中位数 3 年的随访时间进行评估。为了验证腹腔镜胃切除术的非劣效性,还需要更有力的证据。
目的:比较局部进展期胃癌行腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术(LADG)与开腹远端胃切除术(ODG)联合 D2 淋巴结清扫术的 5 年生存结局。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项多中心、开放标签、非劣效性、前瞻性随机临床试验。2009 年 11 月 26 日至 2016 年 7 月 29 日,日本 37 家机构的经组织学证实的胃癌患者符合条件入组。分别于 2014 年 10 月、2018 年 5 月和 2021 年 11 月进行了两次中期分析和最终分析。
干预措施:患者被随机分配(1:1)至 ODG 组或 LADG 组。手术由合格的外科医生专门进行。
主要终点和测量指标:主要终点是 5 年无复发生存率,危险比(HR)的非劣效性边界设定为 1.31。次要终点是 5 年总生存率和安全性。
结果:共有 502 例患者纳入全分析集:ODG 组 254 例(50.6%),LADG 组 248 例(49.4%)。ODG 组患者的中位(IQR)年龄为 67(33-80)岁,包括 168 例男性(66.1%)。LADG 组患者的中位(IQR)年龄为 64(34-80)岁,包括 169 例男性(68.1%)。在安全性分析中,两组严重术后并发症发生率无显著差异(ODG,4.7%[11/233] vs LADG,3.5%[8/227];P = .64)。所有患者随机分组后中位(IQR)随访时间为 67.9(60.3-92.0)个月。ODG 组和 LADG 组的 5 年无复发生存率分别为 73.9%(95% CI,68.7%-79.5%)和 75.7%(95% CI,70.5%-81.2%),HR 为 0.96(90% CI,0.72-1.26;单侧非劣效性 P = .03)。此外,两组总生存时间无显著差异,HR 为 0.83(95% CI,0.57-1.21;P = .34)。两组复发模式相似。
结论和相关性:这项研究的结果表明,基于 5 年随访数据,由合格外科医生进行的局部进展期胃癌腹腔镜辅助 D2 淋巴结清扫术被证明不劣于 ODG。这种腹腔镜方法可能成为局部进展期胃癌的标准治疗方法。
试验注册:UMIN 临床试验注册:UMIN000003420。