Elhusseiny Abdelrahman M, Khaled Omar M, Chauhan Muhammad Z, Sayed Mohamed S, Shaarawy Tarek
From the Department of Ophthalmology, Harvey and Bernice Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (A.M.E., M.Z.C.), Little Rock, Arkansas, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School (A.M.E.), Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, Al-Watany Eye Hospital (O.M.K., T.S.), Cairo, Egypt.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar;271:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.10.024. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
To compare the effectiveness and safety of the Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) to the Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) in managing refractory childhood glaucoma.
Randomized controlled trial.
Two clinical centers.
An ongoing randomized controlled trial including patients ≤ 18 years with refractory childhood glaucoma in whom glaucoma drainage implant surgery was planned. Patients were randomized to receive either PGI or AGV. The primary outcome was the intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction. Secondary outcomes included glaucoma medication reduction, success rate, and complications rate. The success rate was defined as achieving a postoperative IOP between 6-21 mmHg without or with glaucoma medications (up to three topical glaucoma medications), without the need for additional glaucoma surgeries, and without the occurrence of vision-threatening complications or evidence of disease progression. The use of oral glaucoma medications, such as acetazolamide, was considered a failure.
The current report included 44 patients (44 eyes) who completed the one-year postoperative follow-up (25 in the PGI group versus 19 in the AGV group). The mean age at the time of surgery was 96.9 ± 59.1 months (90.5 ± 60.04 months in the PGI group and 105.4 ± 58.5 months in the AGV group). Preoperatively, the mean IOP was 32.6 ± 6.1 mmHg with a mean of 3.6 ± 0.6 glaucoma medications in the PGI group, compared with 29.8 ± 6.1 mmHg (P = .1) with a mean of 3.4 ± 0.7 glaucoma medications (P = .35) in the AGV group. At one year, there were no statistically significant differences in the mean IOP (14.9 ± 4.1 mmHg in the PGI group versus 15.5 ± 3.5 in the AGV group, P = .6) and number of glaucoma medications (1.1 ± 1 in the PGI group versus 1.6 ± 1.03 in the AGV group, P = .1). The success rate of PGI was 80% versus 73.6% in the AGV (P = .2). The postoperative complications rate was comparable in both groups (three eyes in each group).
CONCLUSION/RELEVANCE: At one year postoperatively, the IOP reduction, reduction of glaucoma medications, success rates, and rate of complications were comparable between both groups.
比较保罗青光眼植入物(PGI)与艾哈迈德青光眼引流阀(AGV)在治疗儿童难治性青光眼方面的有效性和安全性。
随机对照试验。
两个临床中心。
一项正在进行的随机对照试验,纳入计划行青光眼引流植入手术的18岁及以下儿童难治性青光眼患者。患者被随机分为接受PGI或AGV治疗。主要结局是眼压(IOP)降低。次要结局包括青光眼药物使用减少、成功率和并发症发生率。成功率定义为术后眼压在6 - 21 mmHg之间,无论是否使用青光眼药物(最多三种局部青光眼药物),无需额外的青光眼手术,且未发生威胁视力的并发症或疾病进展的证据。使用口服青光眼药物,如乙酰唑胺,被视为治疗失败。
本报告纳入了44例(44只眼)完成术后一年随访的患者(PGI组25例,AGV组19例)。手术时的平均年龄为96.9 ± 59.1个月(PGI组为90.5 ± 60.04个月,AGV组为105.4 ± 58.5个月)。术前,PGI组平均眼压为32.6 ± 6.1 mmHg,平均使用3.6 ± 0.6种青光眼药物;AGV组平均眼压为29.8 ± 6.1 mmHg(P = 0.1),平均使用3.4 ± 0.7种青光眼药物(P = 0.35)。一年时,平均眼压(PGI组为14.9 ± 4.1 mmHg,AGV组为15.5 ± 3.5 mmHg,P = 0.6)和青光眼药物使用数量(PGI组为1.1 ± 1种,AGV组为1.6 ± 1.03种,P = 0.1)无统计学显著差异。PGI的成功率为80%,AGV为73.6%(P = 0.2)。两组术后并发症发生率相当(每组3只眼)。
结论/意义:术后一年,两组在眼压降低、青光眼药物使用减少、成功率和并发症发生率方面相当。