Corriveau-Lecavalier Nick, Adams Jenna N, Fischer Larissa, Molloy Eóin N, Maass Anne
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55902, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55902 USA.
Brain Commun. 2024 Oct 25;6(6):fcae376. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae376. eCollection 2024.
Neuronal dysfunction in specific brain regions or across distributed brain networks is a known feature of Alzheimer's disease. An often reported finding in the early stage of the disease is the presence of increased functional MRI (fMRI) blood oxygenation level-dependent signal under task conditions relative to cognitively normal controls, a phenomenon known as 'hyperactivation'. However, research in the past decades yielded complex, sometimes conflicting results. The magnitude and topology of fMRI hyperactivation patterns have been found to vary across the preclinical and clinical spectrum of Alzheimer's disease, including concomitant 'hypoactivation' in some cases. These incongruences are likely due to a range of factors, including the disease stage at which the cohort is examined, the brain areas or networks studied and the fMRI paradigm utilized to evoke these functional abnormalities. Additionally, a perennial question pertains to the nature of hyperactivation in the context of Alzheimer's disease. Some propose it reflects compensatory mechanisms to sustain cognitive performance, while others suggest it is linked to the pathological disruption of a highly regulated homeostatic cycle that contributes to, or even drives, disease progression. Providing a coherent narrative for these empirical and conceptual discrepancies is paramount to develop disease models, understand the synergy between hyperactivation and the Alzheimer's disease pathological cascade and tailor effective interventions. We first provide a comprehensive overview of functional brain changes spanning the course from normal ageing to the clinical spectrum of Alzheimer's disease. We then highlight evidence supporting a close relationship between fMRI hyperactivation and markers of Alzheimer's pathology. We primarily focus on task-based fMRI studies in humans, but also consider studies using different functional imaging techniques and animal models. We then discuss the potential mechanisms underlying hyperactivation in the context of Alzheimer's disease and provide a testable framework bridging hyperactivation, ageing, cognition and the Alzheimer's disease pathological cascade. We conclude with a discussion of future challenges and opportunities to advance our understanding of the fundamental disease mechanisms of Alzheimer's disease, and the promising development of therapeutic interventions incorporating or aimed at hyperactivation and large-scale functional systems.
特定脑区或分布式脑网络中的神经元功能障碍是阿尔茨海默病的一个已知特征。在该疾病早期经常报道的一个发现是,与认知正常的对照组相比,在任务条件下功能磁共振成像(fMRI)血氧水平依赖信号增加,这一现象被称为“过度激活”。然而,过去几十年的研究产生了复杂的、有时相互矛盾的结果。已发现fMRI过度激活模式的大小和拓扑结构在阿尔茨海默病的临床前和临床范围内有所不同,包括在某些情况下伴随的“低激活”。这些不一致可能是由于一系列因素造成的,包括所检查队列的疾病阶段、所研究的脑区或网络以及用于诱发这些功能异常的fMRI范式。此外,一个长期存在的问题涉及阿尔茨海默病背景下过度激活的本质。一些人认为它反映了维持认知表现的代偿机制,而另一些人则认为它与高度调节的内稳态循环的病理破坏有关,这种破坏会导致甚至推动疾病进展。为这些实证和概念上的差异提供一个连贯的叙述对于开发疾病模型、理解过度激活与阿尔茨海默病病理级联之间的协同作用以及制定有效的干预措施至关重要。我们首先全面概述了从正常衰老到阿尔茨海默病临床范围的脑功能变化过程。然后,我们强调支持fMRI过度激活与阿尔茨海默病病理标志物之间密切关系的证据。我们主要关注人类基于任务的fMRI研究,但也考虑使用不同功能成像技术和动物模型的研究。然后,我们讨论阿尔茨海默病背景下过度激活的潜在机制,并提供一个可测试的框架,将过度激活、衰老、认知和阿尔茨海默病病理级联联系起来。我们最后讨论了未来的挑战和机遇,以推进我们对阿尔茨海默病基本疾病机制的理解,以及结合或针对过度激活和大规模功能系统的治疗干预措施的有前景的发展。