Neelon Jamie, Yau Irene, Carlsson Anders H, Smithson Steven Blake, Varon David E, Chan Christopher K, Chan Rodney K, Nuutila Kristo
Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, United States; United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, TX, United States.
Department of Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX, United States.
Burns. 2024 Dec;50(9):107290. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.107290. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
Advancements in the treatment of burns have considerably improved overall survival rates, but they have also highlighted several long-term sequelae related to the injury. Hypertrophic scars can impair function, reduce quality of life, and require multiple procedures as well as physical therapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of topical application of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of burns. Up to 15 deep-partial thickness burns were created on the dorsum of four anesthetized swine. Subsequently, the burn wounds were randomized to receive amiloride, celecoxib, dexamethasone or minocycline mixed in a hydrogel. Silver sulfadiazine cream and blank hydrogel acted as controls. The animals were followed for 90 days and the wounds were assessed on days 3, 7, 14, 28 and 90 post-burn. Assessments were performed using photographs (macroscopic healing, contraction), laser-speckle imaging (blood perfusion), 3D camera (scarring, pigmentation), and histology (inflammation, burn depth, epidermal maturation). Inflammation was present in all burn wound histology specimens and peaked on day 7 in all groups. Regardless of the treatment the burns progressed and were deeper on day 7 in comparison to day 3. The burns were 50 - 80 % healed by day 14, but no significant differences were observed. No differences in epidermal thickness, rete ridges, contraction, hypopigmentation, or scar elevation were seen on day 90. Topical anti-inflammatories did not significantly decrease inflammation or mitigate burn wound progression in deep partial thickness burns in pigs. Also, no significant differences in wound healing or quality of healing were observed.
烧伤治疗的进展显著提高了总体生存率,但也凸显了与该损伤相关的一些长期后遗症。增生性瘢痕会损害功能、降低生活质量,并且需要多次手术以及物理治疗。本研究的目的是调查局部应用抗炎药物在烧伤治疗中的效果。在四只麻醉猪的背部制造多达15处深Ⅱ度烧伤。随后,将烧伤创面随机分组,分别接受混入水凝胶中的氨氯吡咪、塞来昔布、地塞米松或米诺环素治疗。磺胺嘧啶银乳膏和空白水凝胶作为对照。对动物进行90天的随访,并在烧伤后第3、7、14、28和90天对创面进行评估。使用照片(宏观愈合、收缩情况)、激光散斑成像(血流灌注)、3D相机(瘢痕形成、色素沉着)和组织学(炎症、烧伤深度、表皮成熟度)进行评估。所有烧伤创面组织学标本中均存在炎症,且在所有组中均于第7天达到峰值。无论采用何种治疗方法,烧伤均会进展,与第3天相比,第7天的烧伤更深。到第14天时,烧伤创面愈合了50%-80%,但未观察到显著差异。在第90天时,未观察到表皮厚度、 rete嵴、收缩、色素减退或瘢痕隆起方面的差异。局部应用抗炎药并未显著减轻猪深Ⅱ度烧伤的炎症或缓解烧伤创面的进展。此外,在创面愈合或愈合质量方面也未观察到显著差异。