Gyedu Adam, Amponsah-Manu Forster, Mensah Samuel, Donkor Peter, Mock Charles
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
University Hospital, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
World J Surg. 2024 Dec;48(12):3020-3026. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12410. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
Hawthorne effect refers to changes in clinician behavior in response to being observed. It has been minimally evaluated in trauma and surgical research, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
We used data from the first (control) phase of a randomized clinical trial in Ghana (2020-21). Trained observers were stationed in emergency units in eight non-tertiary hospitals to observe the achievement of key performance indicators (KPI) (KPIs) of trauma care. We hypothesized that the observers' presence would create a Hawthorne effect, resulting in clinicians (doctors, nurses) performing above their usual level, with performance highest immediately after the observers were introduced, and with performance then declining over time toward the usual baseline.
We enrolled 2067 injured patients. Achievement of 13 out of 16 KPIs declined significantly over the 14 months after the introduction of observers. For example, airway assessment declined from 77% initially to 60% at the end of the phase (p < 0.001). Chest examination declined from 66% to 31% (p < 0.001). Distal pulses checked declined from 45% to 7% (p < 0.001). The slope of decline in KPI achievement ranged from 0.8%/month (mobility assessed) to 15.9%/month (distal pulses checked).
The decline in KPI achievement over time is consistent with the hypothesis that clinicians performed above their usual level just after the observers were introduced, with performance then declining toward the usual baseline. This study is among the first to provide quantitative data on the Hawthorne effect for trauma research in LMICs. These data are useful for the design of future observational studies and clinical trials.
霍桑效应是指临床医生的行为因被观察而发生的变化。在创伤和外科研究中,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),对其评估极少。
我们使用了加纳一项随机临床试验第一阶段(对照阶段,2020 - 2021年)的数据。训练有素的观察员驻守在八家非三级医院的急诊科,以观察创伤护理关键绩效指标(KPI)的达成情况。我们假设观察员的存在会产生霍桑效应,导致临床医生(医生、护士)表现高于其正常水平,在引入观察员后立即表现最佳,随后随着时间推移表现下降至正常基线水平。
我们纳入了2067名受伤患者。在引入观察员后的14个月里,16项KPI中的13项达成率显著下降。例如,气道评估从最初的77%降至该阶段结束时的60%(p < 0.001)。胸部检查从66%降至31%(p < 0.001)。远端脉搏检查从45%降至7%(p < 0.001)。KPI达成率下降的斜率范围从0.8%/月(活动能力评估)到15.9%/月(远端脉搏检查)。
随着时间推移KPI达成率的下降与以下假设一致,即临床医生在引入观察员后表现高于其正常水平,随后表现朝着正常基线下降。本研究是首批为LMICs创伤研究中的霍桑效应提供定量数据的研究之一。这些数据对未来观察性研究和临床试验的设计很有用。