Jagalasar Madhu, Meena Kadiyala, Sethuraman Giridhar, Shanmugam Priyadarshini, Devi Usha
Consultant Neonatologist, Milann hospital, Bangalore, India.
Department of Neonatology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Tamilnadu, India.
Pediatr Res. 2025 May;97(6):1943-1950. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03706-2. Epub 2024 Nov 9.
The choice of the ideal antiseptic is not only based on its efficacy but also on safety and skin-friendliness. There are no standard recommendations regarding ideal skin preparation in neonates.
This was a prospective cohort study to evaluate the efficacy of 3 antiseptics[10% Povidone Iodine(PI), 70% isopropyl alcohol(AL), 2% chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol(CHG-IPA)] in disinfecting the skin before venipuncture in term neonates as assessed by logarithmic reduction in skin bacterial colony counts post-application. Secondary objectives were to assess the changes in skin condition. Measurements were done pre-, post-antiseptic and 6-24 h (for residual effect) later. Fifty neonates were enrolled in each group.
All three antiseptics caused a significant reduction in bacterial load post-application, but maximal efficacy [2.6(2.2-2.8)log reduction] and, maximal residual effect at 6-24 h was seen with CHG-IPA [2.4(2.2-2.6)log reduction]. The logarithmic reduction in colony counts from pre-intervention to 6-24 h later remained significant for all three groups [(PI, p-0.039; CHG-IPA, p-0.00; AL, p - 0.01)]. After an initial alteration in hydration, and skin condition score, there was a return to baseline after 6-24 h.
CONCLUSION(S): 2% CHG-IPA had better efficacy than AL or PI for skin antisepsis in term neonates. There was no significant change in skin integrity in all three groups.
All three antiseptics [2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol(CHG + IPA), 10% Povidone Iodine(PI), and 70% isopropyl alcohol(AL)] cause significant reduction in bacterial colony counts. CHG + IPA has the maximum efficacy as assessed by log reduction of bacterial colony counts with optimal residual effect favouring its usage in term neonates. The least efficacy is seen with 70% isopropyl alcohol. All three antiseptics are skin-friendly and do not affect the skin integrity. Future studies addressing the clinical outcomes and safety in preterm populations with these commonly used antiseptics should be done.
理想防腐剂的选择不仅基于其有效性,还基于安全性和对皮肤的友好性。关于新生儿理想的皮肤准备,尚无标准建议。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,旨在评估三种防腐剂[10%聚维酮碘(PI)、70%异丙醇(AL)、2%葡萄糖酸洗必泰在70%酒精中(CHG-IPA)]在足月儿静脉穿刺前对皮肤消毒的效果,通过应用后皮肤细菌菌落计数的对数减少来评估。次要目标是评估皮肤状况的变化。在使用防腐剂前、使用后以及6 - 24小时(用于评估残留效果)进行测量。每组纳入50名新生儿。
所有三种防腐剂在应用后均导致细菌载量显著降低,但CHG-IPA的杀菌效果最佳[对数减少2.6(2.2 - 2.8)],且在6 - 24小时时残留效果最佳[对数减少2.4(2.2 - 2.6)]。从干预前到6 - 24小时后,所有三组菌落计数的对数减少均具有统计学意义[(PI,p = 0.039;CHG-IPA,p = 0.00;AL,p = 0.01)]。在初始的水合作用和皮肤状况评分改变后,6 - 24小时后恢复到基线水平。
在足月儿皮肤消毒方面,2% CHG-IPA的效果优于AL或PI。三组的皮肤完整性均无显著变化。
所有三种防腐剂[2%葡萄糖酸洗必泰在70%异丙醇中(CHG + IPA)、10%聚维酮碘(PI)和70%异丙醇(AL)]均能显著降低细菌菌落计数。通过细菌菌落计数的对数减少评估,CHG + IPA的效果最佳,且具有最佳的残留效果,有利于在足月儿中使用。70%异丙醇的效果最差。所有三种防腐剂均对皮肤友好,且不影响皮肤完整性。未来应开展研究,探讨这些常用防腐剂在早产儿群体中的临床结局和安全性。