Black Alexandra T, Tran Son, Haffner Zoë K, Spoer Daisy L, Rahnama-Vaghef Ali, Stowers Jered M
Fellowship-Trained Foot and Ankle Surgeon, West Coast Foot and Ankle, Palm Springs, CA, USA.
Fellow, Foot and Ankle Specialists of Central Ohio, Columbus, OH, USA.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2025 May-Jun;64(3):248-252. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2024.11.002. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
In the setting of ankle trauma, surgical management of syndesmosis injury involves screw fixation and suture button technique. The efficacy of flexible (suture button) versus rigid (screw) fixation in the management of syndesmotic injury has been investigated extensively in current literature. There is sparse data comparing these two techniques across different body mass indices (BMI). In this study, two fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons at urban level-1 trauma centers reviewed blinded post-operative ankle radiographs of BMI-stratified patients undergoing syndesmotic fixation. A total of 79 patients were included for analysis based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. There were 42 patients in the screw fixation group and 37 patients in the suture button group. The average follow-up period was 5.5 months. No significant difference was found in the average radiographic measurements when comparing the two fixation types, regardless of BMI parameters. This was consistent when analyzing individual fixation types stratified by BMI, as well as when comparing BMI groups stratified by fixation type. Additionally, the distribution of body mass index was even across both fixation types. Our study demonstrates that both fixation groups achieved comparable anatomic ankle reduction regardless of body mass index. The authors suggest expanding the indication of suture button fixation to include the higher body mass index patients.
在踝关节创伤的情况下,下胫腓联合损伤的手术治疗包括螺钉固定和缝线纽扣技术。目前的文献中已对灵活(缝线纽扣)与刚性(螺钉)固定在下胫腓联合损伤治疗中的疗效进行了广泛研究。关于在不同体重指数(BMI)下比较这两种技术的数据很少。在本研究中,两位在城市一级创伤中心接受过专科培训的足踝外科医生对按BMI分层的接受下胫腓联合固定患者的术后踝关节X线片进行了盲法评估。根据纳入和排除标准,共纳入79例患者进行分析。螺钉固定组有42例患者,缝线纽扣组有37例患者。平均随访期为5.5个月。比较两种固定方式时,无论BMI参数如何,平均影像学测量结果均无显著差异。在按BMI分层分析个体固定方式时,以及在比较按固定方式分层的BMI组时,情况都是如此。此外,两种固定方式的体重指数分布均匀。我们的研究表明,无论体重指数如何,两个固定组在踝关节解剖复位方面都取得了相当的效果。作者建议扩大缝线纽扣固定的适应症,将体重指数较高的患者纳入其中。