Suppr超能文献

帕博利珠单抗联合奥拉帕利对比帕博利珠单抗联合培美曲塞作为转移性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌维持治疗的3期KEYLYNK-006研究

The Phase 3 KEYLYNK-006 Study of Pembrolizumab Plus Olaparib Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Pemetrexed as Maintenance Therapy for Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC.

作者信息

Gray Jhanelle E, Schenker Michael, Şendur Mehmet Ali Nahit, Leonova Viktoriya, Kowalski Dariusz, Kato Terufumi, Orlova Rashida, Yang James Chih-Hsin, Langleben Adrian, Pilz Arnold, Ungureanu Andrei, Mak Milena Perez, De Angelis Flavia, Aggarwal Himani, Zimmer Zachary, Zhao Bin, Shamoun Mark, Kim Tae Min

机构信息

Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.

Sf Nectarie Oncology Center Craiova and the University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.

出版信息

J Thorac Oncol. 2025 Feb;20(2):219-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2024.10.026. Epub 2024 Nov 7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) inhibitors, including olaparib, upregulate programmed cell death ligand 1, which may increase the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 and anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 therapies.

METHODS

In the phase 3 KEYLYNK-006 trial (NCT03976323), eligible adults with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without targetable genetic alterations who had complete response, partial response, or stable disease after induction therapy with four cycles of pembrolizumab 200 mg every three weeks, pemetrexed 500 mg/m, and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 5 mg/mL/min or cisplatin 75 mg/m were randomized in a one-to-one ratio to olaparib 300 mg orally twice daily or pemetrexed every three weeks, both given with up to 31 cycles of pembrolizumab every three weeks. Dual primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Progression-free survival was tested at interim analysis 2 (i.e., final PFS analysis) and OS at final analysis (FA).

RESULTS

Of 1003 patients who received induction therapy, 672 (67.0%) were randomized to pembrolizumab plus olaparib (n = 337) or pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed (n = 335) in the intention-to-treat population. Median follow-up at FA was 39.9 (range: 28.1-51.5) months. At interim analysis 2, the median (95% confidence interval [CI]) PFS was 7.1 (5.6-8.7) months versus 8.3 (6.9-11.5) months in the olaparib versus pemetrexed groups (hazard ratio = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.92-1.36, p = 0.87). At FA, the median (95% CI) OS was 20.7 (18.0-24.8) months versus 23.0 (19.0-26.4) months (hazard ratio = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.87-1.25, p = 0.6649). Grade 3 to 5 maintenance treatment-related adverse events occurred in 26.1% versus 30.1% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib did not improve PFS or OS versus pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed in previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without targetable genetic alterations.

摘要

引言

聚(二磷酸腺苷 - 核糖)抑制剂,包括奥拉帕利,可上调程序性细胞死亡配体1,这可能会提高抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1和抗程序性细胞死亡配体1疗法的疗效。

方法

在3期KEYLYNK - 006试验(NCT03976323)中,符合条件的成年患者为先前未接受过治疗的转移性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者,无可靶向的基因改变,在接受每三周一次200mg帕博利珠单抗、500mg/m培美曲塞和浓度 - 时间曲线下面积为5mg/mL/min的卡铂或75mg/m顺铂进行四个周期的诱导治疗后达到完全缓解、部分缓解或疾病稳定,按1:1比例随机分为每日口服两次300mg奥拉帕利组或每三周一次培美曲塞组,两组均每三周联合使用多达31个周期的帕博利珠单抗。双主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。在中期分析2(即最终PFS分析)时检测PFS,在最终分析(FA)时检测OS。

结果

在接受诱导治疗的1003例患者中,672例(67.0%)在意向性治疗人群中被随机分为帕博利珠单抗联合奥拉帕利组(n = 337)或帕博利珠单抗联合培美曲塞组(n = 335)。FA时的中位随访时间为39.9(范围:28.1 - 51.5)个月。在中期分析2时,奥拉帕利组与培美曲塞组的中位(95%置信区间[CI])PFS分别为7.1(5.6 - 8.7)个月和8.3(6.9 - 11.5)个月(风险比 = 1.12,95% CI:0.92 - 1.36,p = 。在FA时,中位(95% CI)OS分别为20.7(18.0 - 24.8)个月和23.0(19.0 - 26.4)个月(风险比 = 1.04,95% CI:0.87 - 1.25,p = 0.6649)。3至5级维持治疗相关不良事件分别发生在26.1%和30.1%的患者中。

结论

在先前未接受过治疗的无可靶向基因改变的转移性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者中,与帕博利珠单抗联合培美曲塞相比,帕博利珠单抗联合奥拉帕利维持治疗并未改善PFS或OS。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验