Han Ding, Xie Siyuan, Pan Shoudong, Ou Yangchuan
Anesthesia Department, Children's Hospital affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China.
Anesthesia Department, Children's Hospital affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China; Anesthesia Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2025 Jan;39(1):162-167. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.10.025. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
The effects of anesthetics on electroencephalograms and cerebral perfusion remain understudied in children with congenital heart disease. With regard to this, we compared inhalational anesthesia induction and intravenous anesthesia induction.
A randomized controlled trial.
Operating room in 2 tertiary hospitals.
A cohort of 116 pediatrics patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
The patients were randomly assigned to either the intravenous group (n = 58) or the inhalational group (n = 58). The inhalational group received anesthesia induction with 4% to 6% sevoflurane and a bolus of pipecuronium 0.2 mg/kg, whereas the intravenous group received anesthesia induction with intravenous midazolam 0.2 mg/kg, pipecuronium 0.2 mg/kg, and sufentanil 1 μg/kg. Ten minutes after tracheal intubation, the following parameters were measured: spectral edge frequency, burst suppression event, patient state index, middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity, cerebral oxygen saturation, and hemodynamic parameters. In comparison with the intravenous group, the inhalational group exhibited significant increases in 95% spectral edge frequency, ratio of burst suppression event, blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery, and cerebral oxygen saturation (p < 0.05 for all), as well as decreases in systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, cardiac index, and the maximal slope of systolic upstroke (p < 0.05 for all).
The administration of sevoflurane for anesthesia induction results in more burst suppression, while also demonstrating superior cerebral perfusion when compared with the use of intravenous medications for anesthesia induction.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800015946).
在先天性心脏病患儿中,麻醉剂对脑电图和脑灌注的影响仍未得到充分研究。关于这一点,我们比较了吸入麻醉诱导和静脉麻醉诱导。
一项随机对照试验。
两家三级医院的手术室。
116名接受心脏手术的儿科患者队列。
患者被随机分为静脉组(n = 58)或吸入组(n = 58)。吸入组使用4%至6%的七氟醚和0.2mg/kg的哌库溴铵进行麻醉诱导,而静脉组则使用0.2mg/kg的静脉咪达唑仑、0.2mg/kg的哌库溴铵和1μg/kg的舒芬太尼进行麻醉诱导。气管插管后10分钟,测量以下参数:频谱边缘频率、爆发抑制事件、患者状态指数、大脑中动脉血流速度、脑氧饱和度和血流动力学参数。与静脉组相比,吸入组的95%频谱边缘频率、爆发抑制事件发生率、大脑中动脉血流速度和脑氧饱和度显著增加(均p < 0.05),同时收缩压、舒张压、心脏指数和收缩期上升最大斜率降低(均p < 0.05)。
与使用静脉药物进行麻醉诱导相比,使用七氟醚进行麻醉诱导会导致更多的爆发抑制,同时也显示出更好的脑灌注。
中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR1800015946)。