Suppr超能文献

孤立肢体灌注/输注、免疫检查点抑制剂和病灶内治疗作为黑色素瘤移行转移患者一线治疗的比较

A comparison of isolated limb infusion/perfusion, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and intralesional therapy as first-line treatment for patients with melanoma in-transit metastases.

作者信息

DePalo Danielle K, Dugan Michelle M, Naqvi Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain, Ollila David W, Hieken Tina J, Block Matthew S, van Houdt Winan J, Wouters Michel W J M, Reijers Sophie J M, Asher Nethanel, Broman Kristy K, Duncan Zoey, Anderson Matilda, Gyorki David E, Snow Hayden, Held Jenny, Farma Jeffrey M, Vetto John T, Hui Jane Y C, Kolbow Madison, Saw Robyn P M, Lo Serigne N, Long Georgina V, Thompson John F, Kim Youngchul, Karapetyan Lilit, Ny Lars, van Akkooi Alexander C J, Olofsson Bagge Roger, Zager Jonathan S

机构信息

Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2025 Jan 1;131(1):e35636. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35636. Epub 2024 Nov 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Isolated limb infusion and perfusion (ILI/ILP) has been a mainstay treatment for unresectable melanoma in-transit metastases (ITM), but increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and intralesional therapy (talimogene laherparepvec [TVEC]) introduced several different management options. This study compares first-line ILI/ILP, ICI, and TVEC.

METHODS

Retrospective review from 12 international institutions included patients treated from 1990 to 2022 with first-line ILI/ILP, ICI, or TVEC for unresectable melanoma ITM.

RESULTS

A total of 551 patients were treated, with ILI/ILP (n = 356), ICI (n = 125), and TVEC (n = 70) with median follow-up of 5.5 years. Tumor burden was highest with ILI/ILP and lowest with TVEC (p = .002). Breslow thickness was lowest with TVEC (p = .007). TVEC was mostly used in stage IIIB disease versus IIIC for ILI/ILP and ICI (p = .01). Using ICI as the reference category, TVEC had the highest odds of a complete response (CR) (odds ratio, 1.96; p = .029) and a longer local progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; p = .003). ILI/ILP had shorter local PFS (HR, 1.72; p = .012), PFS (HR, 1.79; p < .001), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (HR, 1.75; p = .014), overall survival (HR, 1.82; p = .009), and melanoma-specific survival (HR, 2.29; p = .004). Stage IIIB disease had longer DMFS (HR, 0.24; p < .001) compared to IIIC/D.

CONCLUSIONS

TVEC as first-line therapy for unresectable melanoma ITM was associated with superior CR rates and local PFS. Notably, TVEC was used in patients with a lower Breslow thickness, disease stage, and tumor burden. Therefore, when compared to ILI/ILP and ICI, TVEC should be considered as first-line therapy for unresectable stage IIIB melanoma ITM with minimal tumor burden and lower Breslow thickness.

摘要

背景

孤立肢体灌注和输注(ILI/ILP)一直是不可切除的黑色素瘤局部转移(ITM)的主要治疗方法,但免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)和瘤内治疗(talimogene laherparepvec [TVEC])的使用增加带来了几种不同的治疗选择。本研究比较一线ILI/ILP、ICI和TVEC。

方法

对12家国际机构进行回顾性分析,纳入1990年至2022年接受一线ILI/ILP、ICI或TVEC治疗不可切除黑色素瘤ITM的患者。

结果

共治疗551例患者,其中ILI/ILP(n = 356)、ICI(n = 125)和TVEC(n = 70),中位随访5.5年。ILI/ILP的肿瘤负荷最高,TVEC最低(p = 0.002)。TVEC的Breslow厚度最低(p = 0.007)。与ILI/ILP和ICI用于IIIC期疾病相比,TVEC大多用于IIIB期疾病(p = 0.01)。以ICI作为参照组,TVEC的完全缓解(CR)几率最高(优势比,1.96;p = 0.029),局部无进展生存期(PFS)更长(风险比[HR],0.40;p = 0.003)。ILI/ILP的局部PFS较短(HR,1.72;p = 0.012)、PFS(HR,1.79;p < 0.001)、远处无转移生存期(DMFS)(HR,1.75;p = 0.014)、总生存期(HR,1.82;p = 0.009)和黑色素瘤特异性生存期(HR,2.29;p = 0.004)。与IIIC/D期相比,IIIB期疾病的DMFS更长(HR,0.24;p < 0.001)。

结论

TVEC作为不可切除黑色素瘤ITM的一线治疗与更高的CR率和局部PFS相关。值得注意的是,TVEC用于Breslow厚度、疾病分期和肿瘤负荷较低的患者。因此,与ILI/ILP和ICI相比,TVEC应被视为不可切除的IIIB期黑色素瘤ITM且肿瘤负荷最小和Breslow厚度较低的一线治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验