Xiao Jian, Li Wei, Tan Guolin, Gao Ru
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 24;10(21):e39758. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39758. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
Recent investigations have underscored the epigenetic modulation of the immune response; however, the interplay between RNA N6-methyladenosine (mA) modification and immunomodulation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC) remains relatively unexplored. To bridge this knowledge gap, we undertook an extensive examination of the potential contributions of mA modification and immunomodulation in HNSC. We amalgamated and deduplicated 27 mA -related genes (m6AGs) and 1342 immune regulation-related genes (IMRGs), resulting in a comprehensive dataset encompassing 1358 genes. This dataset was scrutinized for mA modification and immunomodulatory patterns within HNSC specimens. Employing Cox regression analysis and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) technique, we developed a prognostic risk model for mA regulator-mediated methylation modification and immunomodulation-related differentially expressed genes (m6A&IMRDEGs). Our differential expression analysis delineated 29 m6A&IMRDEGs, and Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) elucidated two module genes (IL11 and MMP13) subjected to correlation analysis. The prognostic prediction models revealed that the clinical predictive efficacy peaked for 1-year forecasts, followed sequentially by 3-year and 5-year predictions. The risk scores derived from the model adeptly categorized HNSC patients into high- and low-risk cohorts, with the high-risk group exhibiting a more unfavorable prognosis. Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) analysis identified 7 hub genes implicated in mA and immune regulation, namely BPIFB1, BPIFB2, GP2, MUC5B, MUC7, PIP, and SCGB3A1. Furthermore, we noted marked disparities in the expression profiles of 18 immune cell types between the high- and low-risk groups. Our results substantiate that the clustering subpopulations and risk models associated with mA and immune regulatory genes portend a poor prognosis in HNSC. The risk score emerges as a potent prognostic biomarker and predictive metric for HNSC patients. A thorough assessment of mA and immune regulatory genes in HNSC will augment our comprehension of the tumor immune microenvironment and facilitate the advancement of HNSC therapeutics.
近期的研究强调了免疫反应的表观遗传调控;然而,头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSC)中RNA N6-甲基腺苷(m⁶A)修饰与免疫调节之间的相互作用仍相对未被探索。为了填补这一知识空白,我们对头颈部鳞状细胞癌中m⁶A修饰和免疫调节的潜在作用进行了广泛研究。我们合并并去重了27个与m⁶A相关的基因(m⁶AGs)和1342个免疫调节相关基因(IMRGs),得到了一个包含1358个基因的综合数据集。对该数据集进行了头颈部鳞状细胞癌标本中m⁶A修饰和免疫调节模式的审查。采用Cox回归分析和最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)技术,我们开发了一个用于m⁶A调节因子介导的甲基化修饰和免疫调节相关差异表达基因(m⁶A&IMRDEGs)的预后风险模型。我们的差异表达分析确定了29个m⁶A&IMRDEGs,加权基因共表达网络分析(WGCNA)阐明了两个进行相关性分析的模块基因(IL11和MMP13)。预后预测模型显示,临床预测效能在1年预测时达到峰值,其次是3年和5年预测。该模型得出的风险评分能够将头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者巧妙地分为高风险和低风险队列,高风险组的预后更差。蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPI)分析确定了7个与m⁶A和免疫调节相关的枢纽基因,即BPIFB1、BPIFB2、GP2、MUC5B、MUC7、PIP和SCGB3A1。此外,我们注意到高风险组和低风险组之间18种免疫细胞类型的表达谱存在显著差异。我们的结果证实,与m⁶A和免疫调节基因相关的聚类亚群和风险模型预示着头颈部鳞状细胞癌的预后不良。风险评分成为头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者有力的预后生物标志物和预测指标。对头颈部鳞状细胞癌中m⁶A和免疫调节基因的全面评估将增强我们对肿瘤免疫微环境的理解,并促进头颈部鳞状细胞癌治疗的进展。