Nunnally Jared, Ko So Mi, Ugale Kristen, Lowe Tammy, Bond Jacyln, Kenny Jon-Emile S, Fargo Ramiz A, Haycock Korbin
Department of Emergency Medicine, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA, USA.
Health Sciences North Research Institute, Emerging Areas of Clinical Research, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Nov 8;12:20503121241290378. doi: 10.1177/20503121241290378. eCollection 2024.
A dysregulated host response to infection resulting in life-threatening organ dysfunction defines the onset of sepsis. Unfortunately, sepsis is common, costly, and deadly. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign publishes regularly updated, evidence-informed, detection, and treatment guidelines culminating in time-sensitive care "bundles." The goal of these bundles is to expedite sepsis recognition because it is widely held that early treatment is life-saving. Hospitals are mandated to publicly report their bundle compliance, and this will soon be tied to hospital reimbursement. For these reasons, hospitals are creating sepsis emergency response teams which are a form of a rapid response team consisting of dedicated medical professionals who evaluate patients with suspected sepsis and initiate therapy when appropriate. Evidence to date support sepsis emergency response teams as a mechanism to improve bundle compliance, and potentially, patient outcome. Nevertheless, some elements of bundled sepsis care are controversial (e.g., intravenous fluid administration) as some argue that mandated treatment precludes personalized care. Herein, we briefly describe general sepsis emergency response team structure, review evidence supporting sepsis emergency response teams to improve bundle compliance and patient outcome and report our unique experience incorporating point of care ultrasound-to guide intravenous fluid-into a nursing-led sepsis team. We propose that our sepsis emergency response team approach allays concern that sepsis care is either bundled personalized. Instead, incorporating point of care ultrasound into a nursing-led sepsis emergency response team increases bundle compliance individualizes care.
宿主对感染的反应失调导致危及生命的器官功能障碍,这标志着脓毒症的发作。不幸的是,脓毒症很常见、代价高昂且致命。拯救脓毒症运动定期发布经过更新的、基于证据的检测和治疗指南,最终形成具有时间敏感性的护理“集束化治疗方案”。这些集束化治疗方案的目标是加快脓毒症的识别,因为人们普遍认为早期治疗能挽救生命。医院被要求公开报告其对集束化治疗方案的依从情况,而且这很快将与医院报销挂钩。出于这些原因,医院正在组建脓毒症应急反应小组,这是一种快速反应小组形式,由专业医疗人员组成,他们对疑似脓毒症患者进行评估,并在适当的时候启动治疗。迄今为止的证据支持脓毒症应急反应小组作为一种提高对集束化治疗方案依从性并可能改善患者预后的机制。然而,脓毒症集束化治疗的一些要素存在争议(例如静脉输液),因为有人认为强制治疗排除了个性化护理。在此,我们简要描述脓毒症应急反应小组的一般结构,回顾支持脓毒症应急反应小组提高集束化治疗方案依从性和患者预后的证据,并报告我们将即时超声检查纳入以护士为主导的脓毒症小组以指导静脉输液的独特经验。我们提出,我们的脓毒症应急反应小组方法消除了对脓毒症护理要么是集束化要么是个性化的担忧。相反,将即时超声检查纳入以护士为主导的脓毒症应急反应小组可提高集束化治疗方案的依从性并实现个性化护理。