Muñoz Felipe, Born Pablo, Bruna Mario, Ulloa Rodrigo, González Cecilia, Philp Valerie, Mondaca Roberto, Blanco Juan Pablo, Valenzuela Emilio Daniel, Retamal Jaime, Miralles Francisco, Wendel-Garcia Pedro D, Ospina-Tascón Gustavo A, Castro Ricardo, Rola Philippe, Bakker Jan, Hernández Glenn, Kattan Eduardo
Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, Santiago, Chile.
Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital de Quilpué, Quilpué, Chile.
Crit Care. 2024 Feb 19;28(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04834-1.
Current recommendations support guiding fluid resuscitation through the assessment of fluid responsiveness. Recently, the concept of fluid tolerance and the prevention of venous congestion (VC) have emerged as relevant aspects to be considered to avoid potentially deleterious side effects of fluid resuscitation. However, there is paucity of data on the relationship of fluid responsiveness and VC. This study aims to compare the prevalence of venous congestion in fluid responsive and fluid unresponsive critically ill patients after intensive care (ICU) admission.
Multicenter, prospective cross-sectional observational study conducted in three medical-surgical ICUs in Chile. Consecutive mechanically ventilated patients that required vasopressors and admitted < 24 h to ICU were included between November 2022 and June 2023. Patients were assessed simultaneously for fluid responsiveness and VC at a single timepoint. Fluid responsiveness status, VC signals such as central venous pressure, estimation of left ventricular filling pressures, lung, and abdominal ultrasound congestion indexes and relevant clinical data were collected.
Ninety patients were included. Median age was 63 [45-71] years old, and median SOFA score was 9 [7-11]. Thirty-eight percent of the patients were fluid responsive (FR+), while 62% were fluid unresponsive (FR-). The most prevalent diagnosis was sepsis (41%) followed by respiratory failure (22%). The prevalence of at least one VC signal was not significantly different between FR+ and FR- groups (53% vs. 57%, p = 0.69), as well as the proportion of patients with 2 or 3 VC signals (15% vs. 21%, p = 0.4). We found no association between fluid balance, CRT status, or diagnostic group and the presence of VC signals.
Venous congestion signals were prevalent in both fluid responsive and unresponsive critically ill patients. The presence of venous congestion was not associated with fluid balance or diagnostic group. Further studies should assess the clinical relevance of these results and their potential impact on resuscitation and monitoring practices.
目前的建议支持通过评估液体反应性来指导液体复苏。最近,液体耐受性和预防静脉淤血(VC)的概念已成为避免液体复苏潜在有害副作用时需要考虑的相关方面。然而,关于液体反应性与VC之间关系的数据较少。本研究旨在比较重症监护病房(ICU)收治的液体反应性和液体无反应性重症患者静脉淤血的发生率。
在智利的三个内科-外科ICU进行多中心、前瞻性横断面观察性研究。纳入2022年11月至2023年6月期间连续入住ICU且<24小时、需要血管活性药物支持的机械通气患者。在单一时间点同时评估患者的液体反应性和VC。收集液体反应性状态、中心静脉压等VC信号、左心室充盈压估计值、肺和腹部超声淤血指数以及相关临床数据。
共纳入90例患者。中位年龄为63[45 - 71]岁,中位序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分为9[7 - 11]。38%的患者为液体反应性(FR+),62%为液体无反应性(FR-)。最常见的诊断是脓毒症(41%),其次是呼吸衰竭(22%)。FR+组和FR-组中至少有一个VC信号的发生率无显著差异(53%对57%,p = 0.69),有2个或3个VC信号的患者比例也无显著差异(15%对21%,p = 0.4)。我们发现液体平衡、毛细血管再充盈时间(CRT)状态或诊断组与VC信号的存在之间无关联。
静脉淤血信号在液体反应性和无反应性重症患者中均很常见。静脉淤血的存在与液体平衡或诊断组无关。进一步的研究应评估这些结果的临床相关性及其对复苏和监测实践的潜在影响。