Ouyang Yanting, Lee Han Yi, Leong Fun Loon, Tey Han Jieh, Shih Vivianne, Lim Elaine Hsuen, Graves Nicholas
Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Nov 10;16:17588359241293381. doi: 10.1177/17588359241293381. eCollection 2024.
Trastuzumab (Herceptin) can be administered intravenously (IV Herceptin) and subcutaneously, with similar efficacy and safety, but with differences in dosage and costs. Previous studies have evaluated the costs of both treatment approaches in the outpatient settings, but no study has compared the costs of IV Herceptin administered in outpatients with subcutaneous Herceptin administered at patients' homes (Homecare SC Herceptin).
This study aimed to compare the per-patient costs of Homecare SC Herceptin versus IV Herceptin administered in a healthcare institution's outpatient setting in Singapore.
We performed a model-based cost-minimization analysis to estimate and compare the per-patient annual costs associated with each treatment modality from a societal perspective.
Direct cost comprised healthcare resources utilization: drug, consumables, manpower, facility and cardiac assessment. Indirect cost was valued using a human capital approach to account for productivity lost by patients. Monte Carlo simulations with 1000 iterations were performed to account for parameter uncertainties. Costs were reported in 2023 Singapore dollars.
The annual societal cost per patient receiving IV Herceptin ranged from S$64,194 to S$65,135, while for Homecare SC Herceptin, it ranged from S$25,865 to S$26,807. Homecare SC Herceptin reduced the annual cost burden by 58.8% and 59.7%, per non-metastatic and metastatic breast cancer patient, respectively. The primary cost contributor was drug therapy, comprising more than 90% of the total cost. Even when excluding the cost of drugs, Homecare SC Herceptin remained cheaper by S$1912 annually. The cost reduction is approximately 60% compared to IV Herceptin regardless of disease status, with a 100% probability that the decision to adopt Homecare SC Herceptin leads to cost savings in Singapore.
Treatment of breast cancer with Homecare SC Herceptin is a cost-saving option compared to IV Herceptin.
曲妥珠单抗(赫赛汀)可通过静脉注射(静脉注射赫赛汀)和皮下注射给药,疗效和安全性相似,但在剂量和成本方面存在差异。以往的研究评估了两种治疗方法在门诊环境中的成本,但尚无研究比较门诊静脉注射赫赛汀与患者在家中皮下注射赫赛汀(居家皮下注射赫赛汀)的成本。
本研究旨在比较新加坡医疗机构门诊环境中居家皮下注射赫赛汀与静脉注射赫赛汀的人均成本。
我们进行了基于模型的成本最小化分析,从社会角度估计和比较每种治疗方式的人均年度成本。
直接成本包括医疗资源利用:药物、耗材、人力、设施和心脏评估。间接成本采用人力资本方法进行估值,以考虑患者损失的生产力。进行了1000次迭代的蒙特卡洛模拟,以考虑参数的不确定性。成本以2023年新加坡元报告。
接受静脉注射赫赛汀的患者每年的社会成本在64,194新元至65,135新元之间,而居家皮下注射赫赛汀的患者每年的社会成本在25,865新元至26,807新元之间。居家皮下注射赫赛汀分别使非转移性和转移性乳腺癌患者的年度成本负担降低了58.8%和59.7%。主要成本贡献者是药物治疗,占总成本的90%以上。即使排除药物成本,居家皮下注射赫赛汀每年仍便宜1912新元。无论疾病状态如何,与静脉注射赫赛汀相比,成本降低约60%,在新加坡采用居家皮下注射赫赛汀的决策有100%的概率会节省成本。
与静脉注射赫赛汀相比,居家皮下注射赫赛汀治疗乳腺癌是一种节省成本的选择。