Palmisano Vitanio, Simonetti Luigi, Marotti Nicola, Reverberi Lorenzo, Comai Alessio, Ganimede Maria Porzia, Comelli Simone, Taglialatela Francesco, Zini Andrea, Paolucci Matteo, Sponza Massimo, Ciardi Chiara, Verganti Luca, Vallone Stefano, Gorgatti Tommaso, Franchini Enrica, Marrazzo Antonio, Paladini Andrea, Della Malva Giuseppina, Barone Michele, Briatico Vangosa Alessandra, Di Stasi Carmine, Burdi Nicola, Semeraro Vittorio
Radiology and Neuroradiology Department, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, Taranto , Italy.
Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, IRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche Di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna , Italy.
Oper Neurosurg. 2024 Nov 12;29(1):53-61. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000001411.
The optimal mechanical thrombectomy technique for distal, medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) stroke remains unknown. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of 2 thrombectomy first-line approaches, direct aspiration (DA), and combined technique (CT) in patients with DMVOs.
We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter database of patients with DMVOs (at or distal to M2 and A1), who underwent mechanical thrombectomy with JET D reperfusion catheters between January 2020 and December 2021. The primary end point was the rate of first-pass complete recanalization, defined as modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mTICI) 3. The hemorrhagic complications, the 90 days functional independence rate (modified Rankin Scale 0-2), and mortality were also evaluated.
A total of 171 consecutive patients were enrolled (95 in DA and 76 in CT cohort). The 2 groups had comparable demographics and baseline characteristics. The DA group had a higher rate of first-pass effect (40.0% vs 10.5%, P < .001), final mTICI 2b-3 (89.5% vs 71.1%, P = .003) and final mTICI 3 (58.9% vs 28.9%, P < .001), shorter groin to reperfusion time (65 ± 43 min vs 101 ± 60 min, P < .001), and higher rate of 90-day functional independence (63.7% vs 36.1%; P = .001) compared with the CT group. There were no significant differences in hemorrhagic complications between the 2 groups. The DA group showed a lower rate of 90-day mortality (9.9% vs 27.8%; P = .004).
In patients with DMVOs, DA with a distal dedicated reperfusion catheter appears to demonstrate better safety and efficacy when compared with the CT using the same catheter.
对于远端中等血管闭塞(DMVO)性卒中,最佳的机械取栓技术尚不清楚。我们旨在比较两种取栓一线方法,即直接抽吸(DA)和联合技术(CT)在DMVO患者中的安全性和有效性。
我们对一个前瞻性收集的多中心数据库进行了回顾性分析,该数据库纳入了2020年1月至2021年12月期间使用JET D再灌注导管对DMVO(M2和A1及其远端)患者进行机械取栓的病例。主要终点是首次通过完全再通率,定义为脑梗死改良治疗(mTICI)3级。还评估了出血并发症、90天功能独立率(改良Rankin量表0 - 2级)和死亡率。
共纳入171例连续患者(DA组95例,CT组76例)。两组的人口统计学和基线特征具有可比性。与CT组相比,DA组的首次通过效果率更高(40.0%对10.5%,P <.001)、最终mTICI 2b - 3级(89.5%对71.1%,P =.003)和最终mTICI 3级(58.9%对28.9%,P <.001),腹股沟至再灌注时间更短(65±43分钟对101±60分钟,P <.001),90天功能独立率更高(63.7%对36.1%;P =.001)。两组之间的出血并发症无显著差异。DA组的90天死亡率较低(9.9%对27.8%;P =.004)。
在DMVO患者中,与使用相同导管的CT相比,使用远端专用再灌注导管的DA似乎具有更好的安全性和有效性。