• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索 STEM 教师走向以公正为中心的教学法的历程。

Exploring the Journey of STEM Faculty into Justice-centered Pedagogy.

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA 95053.

Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33131.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;23(4):ar60. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-02-0063.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.24-02-0063
Abstract

In higher education and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), interlocking oppressions can lead to inequitable environments for those who hold marginalized identities. Instructors can play key roles in either exacerbating or mitigating these inequities through their pedagogical approaches and choice of curricular material. However, it remains unclear how instructors who self-identify as committed to justice achieve higher levels of consciousness around areas of injustice and develop the self-efficacy to dismantle barriers for students over time. Here, we draw upon critical race theory and critical white studies to investigate what events or life experiences influence STEM instructors to understand the importance of social justice and examine how STEM instructors use this understanding to drive pedagogical shifts. We find variations in the ways that instructors' experiences and identities shape their understanding of justice. In addition, we uncover factors that influence the switch moment; curriculum and pedagogical shifts; their relationship to justice work broadly; and barriers and supports for justice work. These stories hold powerful lessons for STEM education, but also for education more broadly, both in terms of pedagogical practice and the questions that shape research agendas on equity in education.

摘要

在高等教育和科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域,连锁压迫可能导致那些具有边缘化身份的人处于不平等的环境中。教师可以通过他们的教学方法和课程材料的选择,在加剧或减轻这些不平等方面发挥关键作用。然而,目前尚不清楚那些自认为致力于正义的教师如何在不公正领域提高意识水平,并随着时间的推移培养为学生消除障碍的自我效能感。在这里,我们借鉴批判种族理论和批判白人研究,探讨是什么事件或生活经历促使 STEM 教师认识到社会正义的重要性,并研究 STEM 教师如何利用这种理解来推动教学转变。我们发现,教师的经验和身份对他们对正义的理解的影响方式存在差异。此外,我们还揭示了影响转变时刻、课程和教学转变的因素,以及它们与正义工作的广泛关系,以及正义工作的障碍和支持。这些故事为 STEM 教育提供了有力的教训,也为更广泛的教育提供了教训,无论是在教学实践方面,还是在影响教育公平研究议程的问题方面。

相似文献

1
Exploring the Journey of STEM Faculty into Justice-centered Pedagogy.探索 STEM 教师走向以公正为中心的教学法的历程。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;23(4):ar60. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-02-0063.
2
Exploring Variations in STEM Instructors' Approaches to Office Hours.探究 STEM 教师在办公时间辅导方式上的差异。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;23(4):ar52. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-03-0109.
3
STEM Faculty as Learners in Pedagogical Reform and the Role of Research Articles as Professional Development Opportunities.理工科教师作为教学改革中的学习者以及研究文章作为专业发展机会的作用。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-12-0251.
4
On faculty development of STEM inclusive teaching practices.关于促进包含STEM的教学实践的教师专业发展
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2017 Oct 2;364(18). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx179.
5
If you are learner-centered and you know it, raise your hand: Perspectives on and implementation of pedagogical changes by science instructors during the COVID-19 pandemic.如果你是以学习者为中心,并且你知道这一点,请举手:新冠疫情期间科学教师对教学方法变革的看法及其实践。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2024 Jul-Aug;52(4):386-402. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21826. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
6
Social Justice, Community Engagement, and Undergraduate STEM Education: Participatory Science as a Teaching Tool.社会公正、社区参与和本科 STEM 教育:参与式科学作为一种教学工具。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Jun;23(2):es3. doi: 10.1187/cbe.23-06-0123.
7
Measuring STEM Instructors' Learning of and Growth in Inclusive Teaching: Development and Evaluation of the STEM Faculty Inclusive Teaching Survey (FITS).衡量STEM教师在包容性教学方面的学习与成长:STEM教师包容性教学调查(FITS)的开发与评估
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2025 Mar 1;24(1):ar13. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-01-0016.
8
Dental Hygiene Clinical Instructors' Pedagogical Beliefs and Described Practices About Student-Centered Education.口腔卫生临床教师关于以学生为中心教育的教学信念和描述性实践。
J Dent Educ. 2019 Sep;83(9):1019-1029. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.106. Epub 2019 May 27.
9
Co-teaching in Undergraduate STEM Education: A Lever for Pedagogical Change toward Evidence-Based Teaching?本科 STEM 教育中的合作教学:迈向基于证据的教学的教学变革杠杆?
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Mar;22(1):es1. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-08-0169.
10
Inclusive Teaching.全纳教学。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Jun;18(2):fe2. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-01-0021.

引用本文的文献

1
Highlighting Counterstereotypical Scientists in Undergraduate Life Science Courses.在本科生命科学课程中突出反刻板印象的科学家。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2025 Jun 1;24(2):es1. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-02-0082.

本文引用的文献

1
Superposition strategies: How and why White people say contradictory things about race.叠加策略:白种人为何以及如何就种族问题自相矛盾。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 1;119(9). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116306119.
2
Science for Others or the Self? Presumed Motives for Science Shape Public Trust in Science.科学为他人还是为自己?科学的假定动机塑造了公众对科学的信任。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Mar;49(3):344-360. doi: 10.1177/01461672211064456. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
3
Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM.
学术界的性别不平等:STEM 领域女性教职员工面临的问题与解决方案。
J Neurosci Res. 2021 Jan;99(1):13-23. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24631. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
4
Signaling Inclusivity in Undergraduate Biology Courses through Deliberate Framing of Genetics Topics Relevant to Gender Identity, Disability, and Race.通过精心构建与性别认同、残疾和种族相关的遗传学主题,在本科生物学课程中体现包容性。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2020 Jun;19(2):es2. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-08-0156.
5
Inclusive Teaching.全纳教学。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Jun;18(2):fe2. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-01-0021.
6
Queer in STEM: Workplace Experiences Reported in a National Survey of LGBTQA Individuals in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Careers.理工科领域的同性恋者:在一项针对科学、技术、工程和数学领域LGBTQA群体的全国性调查中所报告的职场经历。
J Homosex. 2016;63(1):1-27. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1078632. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
7
Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students.理科教员微妙的性别偏见偏爱男学生。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 9;109(41):16474-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109. Epub 2012 Sep 17.