Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh Navid
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht 41635-1314, Iran.
Poult Sci. 2024 Dec;103(12):104465. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104465. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
By applying a sinusoidal function (as a trigonometric model), this study aimed to introduce this function into ostrich weight development research, using ostrich growth data from the literature and comparing it with some routinely used growth models such as monomolecular, Bridges, Janoschek, logistic, Von Bertalanffy, Richards, Schumacher, Morgan, Chanter, and Weibull. During the fitting of nonlinear regression curves, model performance was evaluated and model behavior was examined. Body weight data of the domestic ostriches used in this study were reported in the Blue Mountain Ostrich Nutrition e-bulletin from three different studies (data sets 1 to 3). In all data sets, body weight was measured monthly from one to twelve months of age. The adjusted coefficient of determination, root mean square error, Akaike's information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion were used to evaluate each model's overall goodness-of-fit to different data profiles. Based on the goodness-of-fit criteria, the sinusoidal model was determined to be the most suitable function for fitting the growth curve of ostriches in data sets 1 and 2. However, both monomolecular and logistic models had the worst fit to the growth curve of ostriches in these data sets. For data set 3, the Weibull model provided the best fit of the growth curve of ostriches, but the sinusoidal function had the worst fit. Absolute growth rate (AGR), calculated using the first derivative of the best model with time showed that AGR values increased with age until days 174, 90, and 68 for data sets 1 to 3, respectively, and then decreased. Overall, this study offers implications for advancing research on ostrich production systems and providing insightful information on the application of alternative nonlinear models in modeling ostrich growth.
通过应用正弦函数(作为一种三角模型),本研究旨在将该函数引入鸵鸟体重发育研究中,利用文献中的鸵鸟生长数据,并将其与一些常用的生长模型进行比较,如单分子模型、布里奇斯模型、亚诺谢克模型、逻辑斯蒂模型、冯·贝塔朗菲模型、理查兹模型、舒马赫模型、摩根模型、钱特模型和威布尔模型。在非线性回归曲线拟合过程中,对模型性能进行了评估,并考察了模型行为。本研究中使用的家养鸵鸟的体重数据来自三项不同研究的《蓝山鸵鸟营养电子通讯》(数据集1至3)。在所有数据集中,从1月龄到12月龄每月测量一次体重。使用调整后的决定系数、均方根误差、赤池信息准则和贝叶斯信息准则来评估每个模型对不同数据概况的整体拟合优度。基于拟合优度标准,确定正弦模型是最适合拟合数据集1和2中鸵鸟生长曲线的函数。然而,单分子模型和逻辑斯蒂模型对这些数据集中鸵鸟生长曲线的拟合最差。对于数据集3,威布尔模型对鸵鸟生长曲线的拟合最佳,但正弦函数的拟合最差。使用最佳模型的一阶导数随时间计算的绝对生长率(AGR)表明,AGR值在数据集1至3中分别在第174天、第90天和第68天之前随年龄增加,然后下降。总体而言,本研究为推进鸵鸟生产系统的研究以及提供关于替代非线性模型在鸵鸟生长建模中的应用的有见地信息提供了启示。