• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 Shapley 加法解释模型融合 EEG 和行为信号识别和解释驾驶应激。

Recognizing and explaining driving stress using a Shapley additive explanation model by fusing EEG and behavior signals.

机构信息

School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China; Engineering Research Center of Transportation Information and Safety, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, 430063, China.

School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Jan;209:107835. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107835. Epub 2024 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2024.107835
PMID:39531928
Abstract

Driving stress is a critical factor leading to road traffic accidents. Despite numerous studies that have been conducted on driving stress recognition, most of them only focus on accuracy improvement without taking model interpretability into account. In this study, an explainable driving stress recognition framework was presented to quantify stress based on electroencephalography (EEG) and behavior data. Based on the extraction of key EEG and behavior features and feature selection, low, medium, and high levels of driving stress were identified using seven machine learning algorithms. The recognition results when only using EEG or behavior features were compared with the result when fusing EEG together with behavior features. Then, the dependency effects between brain activity, driving behavior, and stress were analyzed using the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method, and fuzzy rules were obtained by decision tree method. Results indicated that after feature selection, the accuracy of the combined EEG and behavior feature set improved by 8.56% and 26.51% compared to the single EEG and behavior feature sets respectively, and the accuracy rate of 84.93% was achieved. Furthermore, the variations in driver behavior and physiology under stress were identified by the visualization results of SHAP and the quantitative analysis method of decision tree. The changes of different brain regions in the same frequency band showed higher synchronicity under driving stress stimulation. The changes caused by increased stress can be explained by lower speed, smaller maximum lateral lane deviation, smaller accelerator pedal depth and larger brake depth, along with the power changes of the θ and β-band of the brain.

摘要

驾驶压力是导致道路交通事故的关键因素。尽管已经有许多研究致力于驾驶压力识别,但大多数研究仅关注准确性的提高,而没有考虑模型的可解释性。在这项研究中,提出了一种基于脑电(EEG)和行为数据的可解释驾驶压力识别框架,以量化压力。基于关键 EEG 和行为特征的提取以及特征选择,使用七种机器学习算法识别低、中、高三个级别的驾驶压力。比较了仅使用 EEG 或行为特征的识别结果与融合 EEG 和行为特征的结果。然后,使用 SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) 方法分析大脑活动、驾驶行为和压力之间的依赖关系,并通过决策树方法获得模糊规则。结果表明,经过特征选择后,与单独的 EEG 和行为特征集相比,融合 EEG 和行为特征集的准确率分别提高了 8.56%和 26.51%,达到了 84.93%的准确率。此外,通过 SHAP 的可视化结果和决策树的定量分析方法,识别了压力下驾驶员行为和生理的变化。在驾驶压力刺激下,相同频带中不同脑区的变化表现出更高的同步性。压力增加引起的变化可以通过速度降低、最大横向车道偏离减小、油门踏板深度减小和刹车深度增大以及大脑θ和β波段的功率变化来解释。

相似文献

1
Recognizing and explaining driving stress using a Shapley additive explanation model by fusing EEG and behavior signals.利用 Shapley 加法解释模型融合 EEG 和行为信号识别和解释驾驶应激。
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Jan;209:107835. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107835. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
2
An integrated framework for driving risk evaluation that combines lane-changing detection and an attention-based prediction model.一种结合变道检测和基于注意力的预测模型的用于驾驶风险评估的集成框架。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2025;26(2):198-206. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2399301. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
3
Driving behavior recognition using EEG data from a simulated car-following experiment.基于模拟跟车实验中 EEG 数据的驾驶行为识别。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jul;116:30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
4
Predicting collision cases at unsignalized intersections using EEG metrics and driving simulator platform.利用 EEG 指标和驾驶模拟器平台预测无信号交叉口的碰撞事故。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Feb;180:106910. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106910. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
5
Does road environment aesthetics influence risky driving behavior of autonomous vehicles? An evaluation on road readiness using explainable machine learning and random parameters multinomial logit with heterogeneity.道路环境美学是否会影响自动驾驶车辆的危险驾驶行为?基于可解释机器学习和具有异质性的随机参数多项logit模型的道路适用性评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Mar;211:107877. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107877. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
6
Classification of mindfulness experiences from gamma-band effective connectivity: Application of machine-learning algorithms on resting, breathing, and body scan.基于伽马波段有效连接性的正念体验分类:机器学习算法在静息、呼吸和身体扫描中的应用
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Dec;257:108446. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108446. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
7
The aggressive driving performance caused by congestion based on behavior and EEG analysis.基于行为和脑电图分析的拥堵导致的攻击性驾驶行为表现
J Safety Res. 2024 Dec;91:381-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.10.004. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
8
Exploring the fatigue affecting electroencephalography based functional brain networks during real driving in young males.探究年轻男性在真实驾驶过程中影响基于脑电图的功能性大脑网络的疲劳。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Jun;129:200-211. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
9
Impulsivity Classification Using EEG Power and Explainable Machine Learning.基于脑电图功率和可解释机器学习的冲动性分类
Int J Neural Syst. 2023 Feb;33(2):2350006. doi: 10.1142/S0129065723500065. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
10
Driving Fatigue Detection from EEG Using a Modified PCANet Method.基于改进 PCANet 方法的脑电驾驶疲劳检测
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2019 Jul 14;2019:4721863. doi: 10.1155/2019/4721863. eCollection 2019.