Itou C, Sone M, Arai Y, Sugawara S, Kimura S, Onishi Y, Omori J, Koretsune Y
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan; Department of Internal Medicine, Uonuma City Koide Hospital, 34 Hiwatashishinden, Shibata-shi, Niigata 946-0001, Japan.
Clin Radiol. 2025 Jan;80:106723. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2024.10.005. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) for para-aortic retroperitoneal lesions, identify factors affecting false-negative results, and explore the feasibility of alternative CT-guided and ultrasound-guided approaches for challenging anatomical regions.
This single-institution retrospective study included 317 consecutive patients who underwent CNB for para-aortic retroperitoneal lesions. A total of 345 biopsies were performed using 18-gauge cutting needles under CT or ultrasound guidance. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated based on biopsy and follow-up results, and univariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of false-negative CT-guided biopsies.
Of the 332 CT-guided biopsies, 203 targeted lateral aortic lesions. The standard posterior paravertebral approach was commonly used; complex cases requiring alternative CT- or ultrasound-guided approaches involved pre-aortocaval or inter-aortocaval lesions. In CT-guided biopsies, 5 of the 30 lesions in these regions were accessed via trans-caval, trans-pedicle, or trans-disc approaches. All 13 ultrasound-guided biopsies were performed with anterior access except for 2 cases. Malignant lymphoma and nodal metastasis were the most common pathologic findings. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 96.7%, 100%, and 97%, respectively. Neither lesion size nor location predicted false-negative CT-guided biopsies with similar accuracy for lesions ≤15 mm (98.4%) and >15 mm (96.9%). Major bleeding occurred in two CT-guided biopsies (0.6%).
CT-guided CNB demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy across all lesion locations, particularly with the standard posterior paravertebral approach. For more challenging pre-aortocaval or inter-aortocaval lesions, alternative CT-guided posterior or ultrasound-guided anterior approaches may help overcome anatomical constrains and expand percutaneous options.
评估计算机断层扫描(CT)引导下经皮穿刺活检(CNB)用于主动脉旁腹膜后病变的安全性和有效性,确定影响假阴性结果的因素,并探讨在具有挑战性的解剖区域采用替代CT引导和超声引导方法的可行性。
这项单机构回顾性研究纳入了317例连续接受主动脉旁腹膜后病变CNB的患者。在CT或超声引导下,使用18G切割针共进行了345次活检。根据活检和随访结果计算诊断准确性,并进行单因素分析以确定CT引导下活检假阴性的预测因素。
在332次CT引导下的活检中,203次针对主动脉外侧病变。标准的椎旁后路方法常用;需要替代CT或超声引导方法的复杂病例涉及主动脉前腔静脉或主动脉间腔静脉病变。在CT引导下的活检中,这些区域的30个病变中有5个通过经腔静脉、经椎弓根或经椎间盘方法进行穿刺。除2例患者外,所有13次超声引导下的活检均采用前路穿刺。恶性淋巴瘤和淋巴结转移是最常见的病理结果。总体敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为96.7%、100%和97%。病变大小和位置均不能预测CT引导下活检的假阴性,≤15mm病变的准确率为98.4%,>15mm病变的准确率为96.9%。两次CT引导下的活检(0.6%)发生了大出血。
CT引导下的CNB在所有病变部位均显示出较高的诊断准确性,尤其是采用标准的椎旁后路方法。对于更具挑战性的主动脉前腔静脉或主动脉间腔静脉病变,替代的CT引导后路或超声引导前路方法可能有助于克服解剖限制并扩大经皮穿刺选择。