Ali Huzafa
CMH Multan Institute of Medical Sciences, Multan, Pakistan.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2025 Mar;46(3):747-748. doi: 10.1007/s00246-024-03710-7. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
In response to the article "Early Postoperative ECG Changes as a Predictor of Post-Pericardiotomy Syndrome Following Atrial Septal Defect Repair" by Hyberg et al. I commend the authors for their valuable insights into early ECG changes predicting postoperative complications. However, I raise several concerns regarding their study's methodology. Specifically, the use of European Society of Cardiology (ESC) criteria without incorporating pediatric-specific criteria, such as those proposed by Heching et al. potentially limits the study's applicability to younger patients. Additionally, reliance solely on ST-segment elevation and PR segment depression for assessing pericardial inflammation overlooks the significance of Spodick's sign. The lack of a standardized timing for postoperative ECGs and the omission of independent risk factors for Post-Pericardiotomy Syndrome (PPS), including history of pericarditis and pneumonia, further limit the study's comprehensiveness. I suggest that future research should address these aspects to refine diagnostic and monitoring strategies.
针对Hyberg等人发表的文章《术后早期心电图变化作为房间隔缺损修复术后心包切开术后综合征的预测指标》,我赞扬作者对预测术后并发症的早期心电图变化有宝贵见解。然而,我对他们研究的方法提出几点担忧。具体而言,使用欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)标准而未纳入儿科特定标准,如Heching等人提出的标准,可能会限制该研究对年轻患者的适用性。此外,仅依靠ST段抬高和PR段压低来评估心包炎症忽略了斯波迪克征的重要性。术后心电图缺乏标准化的时间安排,以及遗漏心包切开术后综合征(PPS)的独立危险因素,包括心包炎和肺炎病史,进一步限制了该研究的全面性。我建议未来的研究应解决这些方面的问题,以完善诊断和监测策略。