Falah Adam, Winston Gavin P
Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, 18 Stuart St, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Queen's University, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON K7L 2V7, Canada.
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2024 Oct 28;28:100722. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2024.100722. eCollection 2024.
In this narrative review, we explore the differences in processing speed (PS) impairments among three epilepsy conditions; Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE), Frontal Lobe Epilepsy (FLE) and Genetic Generalized Epilepsy (GGE) with a focus on Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy (JME). Despite the large body of research focusing on cognition in epilepsy, the intricacies of PS impairments in the epilepsy syndromes have not been fully explored. We investigate the cognitive profiles with focus on PS associated with each of the three conditions, and the neuropsychological methods employed. Furthermore, we evaluate PS in epilepsy within the theoretical frameworks of PS, such as the Relative Consequence Model, the Limited Time Mechanism Model, and the Neural Noise Hypothesis. We find the main challenge of PS research in epilepsy is the inconsistency of assessment methods utilized in different studies. Furthermore, PS impairments are not isolated but rather interconnected to other cognitive domains. Thus, future studies need to standardize PS assessment tools, and incorporate innovative solutions such as technology and neuroimaging techniques to further enhance our understanding of PS impairments in epilepsy.
在这篇叙述性综述中,我们探讨了三种癫痫病症,即颞叶癫痫(TLE)、额叶癫痫(FLE)和遗传性全身性癫痫(GGE,重点关注青少年肌阵挛癫痫(JME))在处理速度(PS)损伤方面的差异。尽管有大量研究聚焦于癫痫中的认知,但癫痫综合征中PS损伤的复杂性尚未得到充分探索。我们研究了与这三种病症各自相关的、以PS为重点的认知概况,以及所采用的神经心理学方法。此外,我们在PS的理论框架内,如相对后果模型、有限时间机制模型和神经噪声假说,评估癫痫中的PS。我们发现癫痫中PS研究的主要挑战在于不同研究中使用的评估方法不一致。此外,PS损伤并非孤立存在,而是与其他认知领域相互关联。因此,未来的研究需要规范PS评估工具,并纳入技术和神经成像技术等创新解决方案,以进一步加深我们对癫痫中PS损伤的理解。