Department of Psychiatry, Affiliated Kangning Hospital of Ningbo University (Ningbo Kangning Hospital), Ningbo Key Laboratory for Physical Diagnosis and Treatment of Mental and Psychological Disorders, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, China.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2444306. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44306.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are both recognized as effective treatments for depression when applied individually. However, it is unknown whether rTMS combined with tDCS has better efficacy in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD).
To investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of rTMS, tDCS, tDCS + rTMS, and sham tDCS + sham rTMS after 2 weeks of treatment in patients with MDD.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This double-blind, sham-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted from November 2021 to April 2023 at 3 hospitals in China (Kangning Hospital affiliated with Ningbo University, Lishui Second People's Hospital, and Taizhou Second People's Hospital). Adult patients (aged 18-65 years) who were diagnosed with major depressive disorder were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 interventions: active tDCS + active rTMS, sham tDCS + active rTMS, active tDCS + sham rTMS, and sham tDCS + sham rTMS. Data analysis followed an intention-to-treat approach.
Patients received a 2-week course of treatment. The tDCS was administered using a 2-mA direct current stimulator with electrodes placed on the left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Each tDCS session lasted 20 minutes and was conducted 30 to 60 minutes prior to the rTMS session for a total of 10 sessions. The rTMS was delivered at a frequency of 10 Hz using a figure-8 coil placed on the left DLPFC, with each session consisting of 1600 pulses. Treatments were administered 5 times per week for 2 weeks. Sham treatments were performed with a pseudostimulation coil and emitted only sound.
The primary outcome was the change in total score from baseline to week 2 on the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24; score range: 0-52, with the highest score indicating more severe symptoms).
A total of 240 participants (139 females [57.9%]; mean [SD] age, 32.50 [15.18] years) were included. As a primary outcome, patients who received active tDCS + active rTMS showed a significantly greater reduction in mean (SD) HDRS-24 total scores compared with patients in the other 3 groups (active tDCS + active rTMS: 18.33 [5.39], sham tDCS + active rTMS: 14.86 [5.59], active tDCS + sham rTMS: 9.21 [4.61], and sham tDCS + sham rTMS: 10.77 [5.67]; F3,236 = 35.79; η2 = 0.31 [95% CI, 0.21-0.39]; P < .001).
This trial found that tDCS + rTMS was a more effective and safe treatment option than either the tDCS or rTMS intervention alone for patients with MDD.
China Clinical Trial Registry Identifier ChiCTR2100052122.
经颅重复磁刺激(rTMS)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)在单独应用时均被认为是治疗抑郁症的有效方法。然而,rTMS 与 tDCS 联合应用在治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)方面是否具有更好的疗效尚不清楚。
探讨 rTMS、tDCS、tDCS+rTMS 和 sham tDCS+ sham rTMS 在治疗 MDD 患者 2 周后的临床疗效和安全性。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在中国 3 家医院(宁波大学附属康宁医院、丽水市第二人民医院和台州市第二人民医院)进行的双盲、假刺激对照随机临床试验。招募了成年患者(年龄 18-65 岁),诊断为重度抑郁症。参与者被随机分配到 4 种干预措施中的 1 种:tDCS+ rTMS 治疗组、 sham tDCS+ rTMS 治疗组、tDCS+ sham rTMS 治疗组和 sham tDCS+ sham rTMS 治疗组。数据采用意向治疗分析。
患者接受为期 2 周的治疗。tDCS 使用 2 mA 直流电刺激器进行,电极放置在左、右背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)上。每次 tDCS 持续 20 分钟,在 rTMS 治疗前 30-60 分钟进行,共 10 次。rTMS 使用放置在左 DLPFC 的 8 字形线圈进行,频率为 10 Hz,每次治疗包含 1600 个脉冲。每周治疗 5 次,持续 2 周。假刺激治疗使用假刺激线圈进行,仅发出声音。
主要结局是 24 项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS-24)总分从基线到第 2 周的变化(评分范围:0-52,得分越高表示症状越严重)。
共纳入 240 名参与者(139 名女性[57.9%];平均[标准差]年龄为 32.50[15.18]岁)。作为主要结局,与其他 3 组相比,接受 tDCS+ rTMS 治疗的患者 HDRS-24 总分的平均(标准差)降幅更显著(tDCS+ rTMS 治疗组:18.33[5.39], sham tDCS+ rTMS 治疗组:14.86[5.59],tDCS+ sham rTMS 治疗组:9.21[4.61], sham tDCS+ sham rTMS 治疗组:10.77[5.67];F3,236=35.79;η2=0.31[95%置信区间,0.21-0.39];P<0.001)。
本试验发现,与 tDCS 或 rTMS 单一干预相比,tDCS+rTMS 是 MDD 患者更有效、更安全的治疗选择。
中国临床试验注册中心 ChiCTR2100052122。