Hand Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery Group, Institute of Orthopedics and Traumathology, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024 Nov 8;22:eAO0719. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0719. eCollection 2024.
Hand reanimation for finger flexion in patients with total paralysis remains a reconstructive challenge, especially when tendon transfers or neurological reconstruction options are no longer viable. This study aimed to describe a series of patients without hand function by evaluating two hand reanimation techniques.
This observational retrospective study used a case series of hand reanimation. Two techniques were performed-functional free gracilis muscle transfer with microsurgical reconstruction, and transfer of the recovered biceps to the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus with tendon graft augmentation. The two groups, each undergoing one of the techniques, were evaluated for the final functional results using the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) grading system.
Six consecutive patients with total hand paralysis were included, with a mean final follow-up of 7.5 years. After intervention, two patients, one from each technique group, achieved a BMRC grade 2. In the group where tendon transfer of the biceps to the finger flexors was performed, two patients achieved a BMRC grade 3. Additionally, two patients who underwent functional free muscle transfer were achieved a BMRC grade 4.
The transfer of biceps to the finger flexors using tendon grafts, which involves fewer technical difficulties and reduced demands from the surgical team compared to functional free muscle transfer, is a viable alternative for treating patients requiring hand reanimation. However, functional free muscle transfer is recommended as the first option when technically feasible and adequate donor nerves are available, due to its potential for achieving greater final muscular strength in the finger flexors. Reconstructive microsurgeons can use both techniques as viable surgical options for hand reanimation.
对于完全瘫痪的患者手指弯曲的手部再运动仍然是一个重建挑战,特别是当肌腱转移或神经重建选项不再可行时。本研究旨在通过评估两种手部再运动技术来描述一系列没有手部功能的患者。
本观察性回顾性研究使用手部再运动的病例系列。两种技术都进行了:带显微重建的功能性游离股薄肌转移,以及恢复的二头肌向指深屈肌和拇长屈肌的转移,并用肌腱移植物增强。这两组患者分别接受了其中一种技术,使用英国医学研究理事会(BMRC)分级系统评估最终的功能结果。
连续纳入 6 例完全手部瘫痪患者,平均最终随访 7.5 年。干预后,两组各有 1 例患者达到 BMRC 分级 2。在二头肌向指深屈肌转移的组中,2 例患者达到 BMRC 分级 3。此外,接受功能性游离肌肉转移的 2 例患者达到 BMRC 分级 4。
与功能性游离肌肉转移相比,使用肌腱移植物将二头肌转移到手指屈肌是一种可行的替代方法,因为它涉及较少的技术难度,对手术团队的要求也较低,适用于需要手部再运动的患者。然而,当技术可行且有足够的供体神经时,建议将功能性游离肌肉转移作为首选,因为它有可能在手部再运动中实现手指屈肌更强的最终肌肉力量。重建显微外科医生可以将这两种技术都作为手部再运动的可行手术选择。