Pinto Desiree N, Mehta Caitlin, Kelly Edward J, Mathew Shane K, Carney Bonnie C, McLawhorn Melissa M, Moffatt Lauren T, Travis Taryn E, Shupp Jeffrey W, Tejiram Shawn
Firefighters' Burn and Surgical Research Laboratory, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia; Department of Surgery, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia.
Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia.
J Surg Res. 2024 Dec;304:81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.08.011. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
Plasma inclusive resuscitation (PIR) uses fresh frozen plasma as an adjunct to crystalloid in the management of burn shock and has potential benefits over other colloids. Yet, safety concerns for transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) exist. The aim of this study evaluated the association between TRALI and PIR in a cohort of severely burn-injured patients using the updated Canadian Blood Services Consensus definitions.
Burn-injured patients requiring PIR at a burn center from 2018 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. To assess for TRALI, data related to acute hypoxemia, bilateral pulmonary edema, left atrial hypertension, and changes to respiratory status up to 6 h after PIR were recorded. To identify other risks and benefits associated with PIR timing, resuscitative volumes and outcomes were compared between early (0-8 h) and late PIR (8-24 h) initiation.
Of the 88 patients included for study, no patient developed TRALI type I or II under the updated definitions. Early (n = 39) compared to late PIR (n = 49) was associated with a higher percent total body surface area (TBSA, 36.3%, 26.0%, P = 0.01). The predicted 24-h volume was higher for early PIR (10.1 L, 6.3 L, P = 0.049), but the observed 24-h volume (cc/kg/%TBSA) was not significantly different (5.2, 5.3, P = 0.62).
In a cohort of severely burn-injured patients undergoing PIR, no patient developed TRALI type I or type II under the updated Canadian Blood Services Consensus definitions. Earlier use of PIR was not associated with higher resuscitative volumes despite higher TBSA. Further studies are necessary to better ascertain the potential risks and benefits associated with PIR.
血浆包容性复苏(PIR)在烧伤休克管理中使用新鲜冰冻血浆作为晶体液的辅助治疗,与其他胶体相比具有潜在益处。然而,存在与输血相关的急性肺损伤(TRALI)的安全问题。本研究的目的是使用更新后的加拿大血液服务共识定义,评估一组严重烧伤患者中TRALI与PIR之间的关联。
回顾性分析2018年至2022年在一家烧伤中心需要进行PIR的烧伤患者。为评估TRALI,记录与急性低氧血症、双侧肺水肿、左心房高压以及PIR后6小时内呼吸状态变化相关的数据。为确定与PIR时机相关的其他风险和益处,比较了早期(0 - 8小时)和晚期PIR(8 - 24小时)开始时的复苏量和结局。
在纳入研究的88例患者中,根据更新后的定义,没有患者发生I型或II型TRALI。与晚期PIR(n = 49)相比,早期PIR(n = 39)患者的总体表面积百分比更高(36.3%,26.0%,P = 0.01)。早期PIR的预计24小时液体量更高(10.1 L,6.3 L,P = 0.049),但观察到的24小时液体量(cc/kg/%TBSA)无显著差异(5.2,5.3,P = 0.62)。
在一组接受PIR的严重烧伤患者中,根据更新后的加拿大血液服务共识定义,没有患者发生I型或II型TRALI。尽管总体表面积百分比更高,但早期使用PIR与更高的复苏量无关。需要进一步研究以更好地确定与PIR相关的潜在风险和益处。