Taylor Graeme J, Porcelli Piero, Bagby R Michael
Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada.
Department of Psychological, Health, and Territorial Sciences, University of Chieti, Italy.
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2024 Oct;21(5):329-357. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20240501.
Our goal was to compare the original conceptualization of the alexithymia construct with the attention-appraisal model, focusing primarily on the removal of the reduced imaginal activity component, a seminal aspect of the construct in the original model. We also examined associations between alexithymia and emotional distress and emotion regulation, attachment, and trauma, and whether alexithymia is a transdiagnostic risk factor. We discuss differences between the models in the treatment of alexithymia and also differences in measurement.
We conducted a narrative review of the scientific literature validating the original model of alexithymia and examined the comparatively few empirical studies evaluating the attention-appraisal model. Articles describing contemporary theoretical ideas about the relationship between imagination and emotion were reviewed, as well as studies exploring associations between alexithymia and imaginal activity.
The attention-appraisal model of alexithymia is theoretically derived and examined empirically in studies using correlation/measurement-based methods that employed self-report measures with mostly non-clinical samples and conducted primarily by researchers led by developers of the model. The original model of alexithymia is derived from observations of patients in clinical settings; its validity is supported by findings from hundreds of empirical investigations spanning nearly four decades with nonclinical and a variety of clinical samples using both correlation-based and experimental studies and methods of measurement other than self-report, and by independent teams of researchers. The reduced imaginal activity component of the alexithymia construct is mostly supported by these studies.
Because of the dearth of studies with clinical samples, the absence of investigations by independent researchers, and the limited range of methods and measurements to evaluate and assess the model, there is insufficient evidence to warrant removal of the imaginal activity component of the alexithymia construct and for replacing the original conceptualization of the construct with the attention-appraisal model.
我们的目标是将述情障碍结构的原始概念与注意力-评估模型进行比较,主要关注去除想象活动减少这一组成部分,这是原始模型中该结构的一个重要方面。我们还研究了述情障碍与情绪困扰、情绪调节、依恋和创伤之间的关联,以及述情障碍是否为一种跨诊断风险因素。我们讨论了两种模型在述情障碍治疗方面的差异以及测量方法的差异。
我们对验证述情障碍原始模型的科学文献进行了叙述性综述,并研究了评估注意力-评估模型的相对较少的实证研究。回顾了描述关于想象与情绪关系的当代理论观点的文章,以及探索述情障碍与想象活动之间关联的研究。
述情障碍的注意力-评估模型是在理论推导的基础上,通过相关性/基于测量的方法进行实证研究的,这些研究使用自我报告测量,主要针对非临床样本,且主要由该模型开发者带领的研究人员进行。述情障碍的原始模型源自对临床环境中患者的观察;其有效性得到了近四十年来数百项实证研究结果的支持,这些研究涉及非临床和各种临床样本,采用了基于相关性和实验性的研究以及除自我报告之外的测量方法,并且由独立的研究团队进行。述情障碍结构中想象活动减少这一组成部分在这些研究中大多得到了支持。
由于缺乏针对临床样本的研究、独立研究人员的调查以及评估该模型的方法和测量手段有限,没有足够的证据支持去除述情障碍结构中的想象活动组成部分,并用注意力-评估模型取代该结构的原始概念。