Suppr超能文献

术后神经肌肉功能。

Postoperative neuromuscular function.

作者信息

Beemer G H, Rozental P

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 1986 Feb;14(1):41-5. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8601400110.

Abstract

One hundred patients who received a competitive neuromuscular blocking agent during anaesthesia were randomly selected for evaluation of neuromuscular function immediately on their arrival in the recovery room. The anaesthetist was not aware that the patient would be evaluated in the recovery room. Neuromuscular function was assessed by a train-of-four (TOF) ratio, and in conscious and co-operative patients by a series of bedside tests of neuromuscular function. Twenty-one patients had a TOF ratio of less than 0.70 and seven patients a TOF ratio of less than 0.60. Bedside tests of neuromuscular function did not reliably detect this defect in neuromuscular transmission. It is concluded that a relatively large number of patients have a defect in neuromuscular transmission on their arrival in the recovery room, and suggested that this reflects the inadequacy of clinical methods used for the administration and antagonism of competitive neuromuscular blocking agents at this institution.

摘要

一百名在麻醉期间接受竞争性神经肌肉阻滞剂的患者在抵达恢复室后立即被随机挑选出来,以评估其神经肌肉功能。麻醉医生并不知道患者会在恢复室接受评估。通过四个成串刺激(TOF)比率评估神经肌肉功能,对于清醒且配合的患者,则通过一系列床边神经肌肉功能测试进行评估。21名患者的TOF比率低于0.70,7名患者的TOF比率低于0.60。床边神经肌肉功能测试未能可靠地检测出这种神经肌肉传递缺陷。得出的结论是,相当多的患者在抵达恢复室时存在神经肌肉传递缺陷,并表明这反映了该机构在使用和拮抗竞争性神经肌肉阻滞剂时临床方法的不足。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验